Search found 903 matches

by the Jabberwock
Wed Dec 19, 2018 8:12 am
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Deep Mines
Replies: 43
Views: 1200

Re: a Clarification

The sad part about this whole convo is: What good does a CLARIFICATION for this card do? The card itself HAS a clarification, and is ignored , for some reason. I don't think the clarification (as you say) on the card is being ignored. I think the "clarification" in parenthesis is just reminding peo...
by the Jabberwock
Wed Dec 19, 2018 8:05 am
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Deep Mines
Replies: 43
Views: 1200

Re: Deep Mines

"A company may move to this site only from one of your protected Wizardhavens [W] and only if you have more than 6 stage points. The protected Wizardhaven is the surface site for Deep Mines (i.e., the SITES are adjacent and the movement roll required to move between them is 0)." As seen a requireme...
by the Jabberwock
Wed Dec 19, 2018 8:00 am
Forum: Rules & Errata
Topic: WHCtK & ACM bad news
Replies: 3
Views: 21

Re: WHCtK & ACM bad news

Black Rain requires a Ruins & Lairs in a Wilderness. I'm not so sure that it targets it though. It clearly targets the Sage and targets/affects the Ring Item you play. I mean does CoE do clarifications any more? or only erratum? IDK Yes, the CoE issues both clarifications and errata via the Annual R...
by the Jabberwock
Wed Dec 19, 2018 6:01 am
Forum: Rules & Errata
Topic: WHCtK & ACM bad news
Replies: 3
Views: 21

Re: WHCtK & ACM bad news

So you are saying that A Chance Meeting / WHCTK targets the site that the character is played at?


Also, did you intentionally post this in the Rules & Errata forum? Are you wanting to discuss this as a possible candidate for an erratum?
by the Jabberwock
Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:07 am
Forum: Resolved Reports / Requests
Topic: Session problem
Replies: 8
Views: 337

Re: Session problem

CCG Collector wrote:
Tue Dec 18, 2018 4:41 pm
I believe so. I tried a link on BoardGameGeek pointing to the old style URL and it worked, so hopefully that's the same across the board.
Thanks for the info. I am now moving this topic to the Resolved Reports / Requests forum.
by the Jabberwock
Tue Dec 18, 2018 5:24 am
Forum: Resolved Reports / Requests
Topic: Session problem
Replies: 8
Views: 337

Re: Session problem

Moreover, all the links within this forum fail. Look at all the links in this topic for example: http://councilofelrond.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=103&t=3541 This has been fixed. All of the links that previously worked prior to the most recent update should now work again. If you encounter any that ...
by the Jabberwock
Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:32 pm
Forum: News, Issues, Questions
Topic: Middle-earth: The Necromancer
Replies: 42
Views: 4222

Re: Middle-earth: The Necromancer

Can an update be provided please on an estimated ship date? Last I heard NECRO was supposed to be printed in November and ship for the holidays.

Thanks!
by the Jabberwock
Sun Dec 16, 2018 7:36 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: bane of the ithil stone
Replies: 10
Views: 1169

Re: bane of the ithil stone

Bane stops Hero Pallando's ability following NetRep #12, which reveals the top card of the discard pile. It will therefore stop other revealing actions as well. In addition to my reply above, both cards state "search through or look at", which I believe should answer your questions. Why would Bane ...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Dec 15, 2018 5:57 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Discarding Stage Resources & Their Ripple Effects
Replies: 25
Views: 674

Re: Discarding Stage Resources & Their Ripple Effects

Didn't he overturn that in a later digest? I don't believe so, as I just went back through all of the ICE Digests (Van rulings) yesterday and do not see anywhere that he over-turned it. Unless there are digests other than #s 579-588 that I am unaware of. Interestingly, Van's reply that I quoted abo...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Dec 15, 2018 5:49 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: The Ring's Betrayal
Replies: 6
Views: 218

Re: The Ring's Betrayal

Well that makes me feel better if that's the case. :)
by the Jabberwock
Sat Dec 15, 2018 8:13 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Discarding Stage Resources & Their Ripple Effects
Replies: 25
Views: 674

Re: Discarding Stage Resources & Their Ripple Effects

Discard this card when the site is discarded or returned to its location deck. It cannot be discarded otherwise. Hidden Haven can't satisfy Echoes. Apparently Van Norton also missed this. :? RULING DIGEST 585 I played Hidden Haven and Guarded Haven to change a site to a Protected Fallen Wizard Have...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Dec 15, 2018 8:07 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: The Ring's Betrayal
Replies: 6
Views: 218

Re: The Ring's Betrayal

Okay, my mind was just blown while reading NetRep Digest # 4: 1. Rolled Down to the Sea says: "Opponent must discard a ring from his hand or from one of his companies if available. If no rings are available as such, he must reveal his hand to you." So, do both the gold ring item cards like Beautiful...
by the Jabberwock
Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:44 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: A Chance Meeting
Replies: 9
Views: 114

Re: A Chance Meeting

ICE often had no idea how powerful cards were. That is one of the explanations for rarity changes of cards that are essentially the same. I agree. Muster needing a nerf erratum is another good example. Then the minion version later, Threats , was made a rare. As Konrad points out, Wizard's Flame an...
by the Jabberwock
Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:41 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: We Have Come to Kill: target?
Replies: 23
Views: 1492

Re: We Have Come to Kill: target?

We Have Come to Kill does not create GI exceedance. To play a character in result of We Have Come to Kill there must be enough free GI, or DI. We Have Come to Kill may be used to bring in agents, but not Ringwraiths. You must have enough influence to control the character to play this card. Because...
by the Jabberwock
Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:37 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: We Have Come to Kill: target?
Replies: 23
Views: 1492

Re: We Have Come to Kill: target?

Can WHCTK be played outside the Organization Phase if it creates a G.I. exceedance?

Go to advanced search