Search found 1108 matches

by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:39 am
Forum: The Marketplace
Topic: the Jabberwock's Haves and Wants (WTTF/FT)
Replies: 11
Views: 1618

Re: the Jabberwock's Haves and Wants (WTTF/FT)

Want List Updated!
by the Jabberwock
Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:54 pm
Forum: The Marketplace
Topic: FS/FT/FO Sealed MEBA Balrog complete set
Replies: 5
Views: 200

Re: FS/FT/FO Sealed MEBA Balrog complete set

Hi all. I just got my family into the game and I have an extra sealed Balrog complete set that I would like to sell or trade so that I can acquire Lidless Eye and Against the Shadows cards I never got. I would love to make something happen here. I am not real sure on the value either so I would app...
by the Jabberwock
Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:53 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Secrets of Their Forging
Replies: 2
Views: 392

Re: Secrets of Their Forging

This makes sense. Too bad we didn't vote on both last time. Maybe there should be some administrative action by the Council to just accept this automatically to save everyone's time. Sometimes there isn’t enough time to get multiple versions of cards prepared in time for the vote. I seem to recall ...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 5:31 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
Replies: 10
Views: 575

Re: Icy Touch (clarification)

@ Theo - Do I have that right? This was not answered. Please confirm. I was refraining from speaking for Konrad, but I would read your example as conforming to his latest proposal. HAHA!! When you quoted my post and replied, I erroneously assumed you were the one who wrote the post I questioned. So...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:03 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Twilight
Replies: 9
Views: 645

Re: Twilight

I also am still not really following along here.... You are proposing changing this language: "may be played at any point" to this language: "may be played at any time" You are using this language change as a hypothetical nerf to the card allowing a player to interrupt a chain of effects resolving, ...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 3:39 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Actions created by playing an item
Replies: 6
Views: 436

Re: Actions created by playing an item

So can you provide an example that would illustrate the importance of whether the Trap Attack (with Forgotten Scrolls) takes place immediately before the Bounty of the Hoard chain resolves vs it taking place after the Bounty of the Hoard chain resolves? Also, since Attacks must begin their own chain...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:57 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Open to the Summons
Replies: 3
Views: 257

Re: Open to the Summons

I agree with Konrad's point 3 (copied below). This seems to be an accurate reflection of how cards are intended to be played. 3. Unless stated otherwise in text of a card, if non-short-event card states that player may take some standard action (i.e. action that otherwise can be taken without addit...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:09 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company
Replies: 16
Views: 929

Re: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company

I also think Secret Passage is perhaps a bad example to use? Does it matter in the case of Secret Passage whether it resolves before or after the Ahunt Dragon and Snowstorm? Either way, the hazard player may not play any hazard creatures on the company. Obviously the hazard player may not play any ...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:37 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
Replies: 10
Views: 575

Re: Icy Touch (clarification)

@ Theo - Do I have that right? This was not answered. Please confirm. Also... is this the only corruption card that has this problem? Any placed corruption currently can be stacked on the same character in one turn, in addition to another corruption card played. Example: 3x Nazgul attacks, each with...
by the Jabberwock
Fri Jul 12, 2019 10:44 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification
Replies: 7
Views: 608

Re: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification

Alternatively, CoE hosts their own copy of the CRF with such offenders omitted. :P Indeed, however, the new URD being constructed will incorporate most of the CRF, as well as ICE Digests and NetRep rulings. So in theory this should take care of the issue. Still, would be nice to have a cleaned up, ...
by the Jabberwock
Fri Jul 12, 2019 6:34 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: MPs for Trophies
Replies: 8
Views: 367

Re: MPs for Trophies

I think you are confusing Orc and Troll characters/companies rules and player scoring rules. You are right, my apologies. After going back and carefully re-reading CoE Erratum # 31, the MELE Rulebook, and the MEWH Rulebook, I rescind my previous opinion. I agree that clarifying this point is worthw...
by the Jabberwock
Fri Jul 12, 2019 4:33 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Distribution of Direct Influence
Replies: 3
Views: 187

Re: Distribution of Direct Influence

Here is a quote from one old question on the issue: Direct Influence - Thrain II is controlling a 5 mind dwarf which uses all of his available direct influence (2 points of general and 3 points specific towards dwarves and dwarf factions). If he attempts to bring in a dwarf faction, will he get the ...
by the Jabberwock
Fri Jul 12, 2019 3:39 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.
Replies: 18
Views: 900

Re: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.

So the idea is to directly overturn the following from MEWH, correct? However, you may only use a character if his mind attribute is 5 or less. Essentially, yes, but directly... no. My proposal is for erratum to the CRF as mentioned earlier in this topic. Technically it would not be an erratum of t...
by the Jabberwock
Fri Jul 12, 2019 5:12 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.
Replies: 18
Views: 900

Re: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.

Thanks for the contributions guys. FYI, there is also a NetRep ruling that supports the idea that FW's may use characters with >5 mind once in play: NetRep Rulings Digest #41 Am I allowed to discard a Thrall of the Voice on a 6-mind character during my organization phase (to lower my SP in the face ...
by the Jabberwock
Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:27 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Order of an actions caused by effects of cards not in play
Replies: 8
Views: 634

Re: Order of an actions caused by effects of cards not in play

Is it possible to combine this proposal with this one: https://councilofelrond.org/forum/viewt ... 145&t=3729
since they address very similar issues?

Go to advanced search