Search found 1114 matches

by the Jabberwock
Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:53 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Under-deeps (The Wind Throne)
Replies: 7
Views: 682

Re: Under-deeps (The Wind Throne)

This submission will be included in this year's ARV. Thanks for the input guys. I like Konrad's latest suggestion, but I would slightly amend it. Here is my updated proposal, please let me know what you guys think: {Rules Erratum} Change This: A Wizardhaven is not considered to be adjacent to an Un...
by the Jabberwock
Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:26 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Reversion of Site Types
Replies: 13
Views: 910

Re: Reversion of Site Types

This submission will be included in this year's ARV. Thanks to everyone for your input on this. Here is an updated attempt at the language.... please let me know what you guys think: {Rules Erratum} Change This: The play of certain cards can change the type of sites that your companies may use (e.g...
by the Jabberwock
Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:02 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: RIVER on-guard
Replies: 10
Views: 820

Re: RIVER on-guard

Lol Chris.... that's ridiculous! Haha
by the Jabberwock
Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:07 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: RIVER on-guard
Replies: 10
Views: 820

Re: RIVER on-guard

This submission will be included in this year's ARV.

If anyone objects to the suggested wording below, please speak up. Thank you.

{clarification}
River -
May not be revealed on-guard.
by the Jabberwock
Thu Sep 05, 2019 5:31 am
Forum: The Marketplace
Topic: the Jabberwock's Haves and Wants (WTTF/FT)
Replies: 12
Views: 3497

Re: the Jabberwock's Haves and Wants (WTTF/FT)

Updated my Want List after another nice trade with DuncanNeeds2Shave! Thanks man!
by the Jabberwock
Wed Sep 04, 2019 9:47 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Submission Rules - Please Read
Replies: 20
Views: 3354

Re: Submission Rules - Please Read

Hi everyone, My apologies, but due to some ROC member complications, we are running behind the timeline for this year's ARV. We are currently working to get the vote published as soon as possible. What I can say at this point: - We will only be accepting 30-40 of the more than 100 submissions for th...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:39 am
Forum: The Marketplace
Topic: the Jabberwock's Haves and Wants (WTTF/FT)
Replies: 12
Views: 3497

Re: the Jabberwock's Haves and Wants (WTTF/FT)

Want List Updated!
by the Jabberwock
Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:54 pm
Forum: The Marketplace
Topic: FS/FT/FO Sealed MEBA Balrog complete set
Replies: 5
Views: 1217

Re: FS/FT/FO Sealed MEBA Balrog complete set

Hi all. I just got my family into the game and I have an extra sealed Balrog complete set that I would like to sell or trade so that I can acquire Lidless Eye and Against the Shadows cards I never got. I would love to make something happen here. I am not real sure on the value either so I would app...
by the Jabberwock
Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:53 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Secrets of Their Forging
Replies: 2
Views: 1062

Re: Secrets of Their Forging

This makes sense. Too bad we didn't vote on both last time. Maybe there should be some administrative action by the Council to just accept this automatically to save everyone's time. Sometimes there isn’t enough time to get multiple versions of cards prepared in time for the vote. I seem to recall ...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 5:31 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
Replies: 28
Views: 1697

Re: Icy Touch (clarification)

@ Theo - Do I have that right? This was not answered. Please confirm. I was refraining from speaking for Konrad, but I would read your example as conforming to his latest proposal. HAHA!! When you quoted my post and replied, I erroneously assumed you were the one who wrote the post I questioned. So...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:03 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Twilight
Replies: 9
Views: 1489

Re: Twilight

I also am still not really following along here.... You are proposing changing this language: "may be played at any point" to this language: "may be played at any time" You are using this language change as a hypothetical nerf to the card allowing a player to interrupt a chain of effects resolving, ...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 3:39 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Actions created by playing an item
Replies: 7
Views: 1249

Re: Actions created by playing an item

So can you provide an example that would illustrate the importance of whether the Trap Attack (with Forgotten Scrolls) takes place immediately before the Bounty of the Hoard chain resolves vs it taking place after the Bounty of the Hoard chain resolves? Also, since Attacks must begin their own chain...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:57 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Open to the Summons
Replies: 26
Views: 1609

Re: Open to the Summons

I agree with Konrad's point 3 (copied below). This seems to be an accurate reflection of how cards are intended to be played. 3. Unless stated otherwise in text of a card, if non-short-event card states that player may take some standard action (i.e. action that otherwise can be taken without addit...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:09 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company
Replies: 17
Views: 2234

Re: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company

I also think Secret Passage is perhaps a bad example to use? Does it matter in the case of Secret Passage whether it resolves before or after the Ahunt Dragon and Snowstorm? Either way, the hazard player may not play any hazard creatures on the company. Obviously the hazard player may not play any ...
by the Jabberwock
Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:37 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
Replies: 28
Views: 1697

Re: Icy Touch (clarification)

@ Theo - Do I have that right? This was not answered. Please confirm. Also... is this the only corruption card that has this problem? Any placed corruption currently can be stacked on the same character in one turn, in addition to another corruption card played. Example: 3x Nazgul attacks, each with...

Go to advanced search