Search found 368 matches

by rezwits
Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:15 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)
Replies: 5
Views: 41

Re: Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)

(3) Mixed companies, i.e., those including at least one ringwraith character and at least one non-ringwraith character are considered ringwraith companies. Therefore, they cannot be targeted by the first use of Heedless Revelry. This indicates that the status quo for Heedless Revelry does care abou...
by rezwits
Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:43 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)
Replies: 24
Views: 901

Re: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)

Yeah, but that's too simple, I AGREE 99%, tho btw... but for completeness there are times due to Long Dark Reach (Normally) Rulings where they actually COULD be Normally Playable. Like for instance, if in the cards text the card said: If Doors of Night is in play, may be played at Ruins & Lairs. (no...
by rezwits
Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:16 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)
Replies: 24
Views: 901

Re: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)

Of additional importance: A creature "played at a site in" a region is the same as being "keyed to" the site by name. These two CRFs have purpose: A creature “played at” a site is the same as being “keyed to” the site. A creature “played at a site in” a region is the same as being “keyed to” the si...
by rezwits
Mon Mar 18, 2019 2:53 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)
Replies: 5
Views: 41

Re: Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)

Well I was thinking in context, because they seem to clarify the opposite by these words: Playable on a non-Ringwraith company that is not moving. Make a roll (or draw a #) for each untapped non-Wizard character in the company; modify this roll by -2 for hero characters. If the result is greater tha...
by rezwits
Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:31 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)
Replies: 5
Views: 41

Re: Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)

Better example: Ringwraith Followers are clearly NOT the same as Balrog Followers... So, if a card is referring to "Ringwraith" in their singularities on cards, THIS make sense to substitute Balrog for Ringwraith. But when you start mixing and matching (conjoinging) I don't see how this keeps extend...
by rezwits
Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:18 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)
Replies: 5
Views: 41

Non-RW Company (ex. Heedless)

I have a question about the Balrog as Ringwraith rule: A BALROG PLAYER A Balrog player acts as a Ringwraith player. Any card and rules text applying to a Ringwraith also applies to The Balrog (e.g., if a card refers to a Ringwraith, it now applies to “a Ringwraith or The Balrog”). I understand the i...
by rezwits
Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:26 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)
Replies: 24
Views: 901

Re: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)

ABSOLUTE FOOD FOR THOUGHT in the meanhwile: Corsairs of Umbar Men. Five strikes. May also be played keyed to Andrast, Anfalas, Belfalas, Cardolan, Enedhwaith, Harondor, Lindon, Lebennin, and Old Pukel-land; and may also be played at Ruins & Lairs {R} and Shadow-holds {S} in these regions. May also b...
by rezwits
Tue Mar 12, 2019 9:02 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Nenya, and short events
Replies: 13
Views: 297

Re: Nenya, and short events

Man I read that ruling from 563. Wow, that was a weak ruling... :cry: Very sad... I mean that ruling, just makes me think that: No wonder there are troubles with the game. I mean people come in here (on CoE) and try to argue things using "basic English" for starters as a basis, and other factors and...
by rezwits
Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:51 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Nenya, and short events
Replies: 13
Views: 297

Re: Nenya, and short events

dude, Theo I NEED a PDF of where ever you are pulling that up from, NOW :D

I don't have that documentation, I was thinking I was missing something...

Thanks! Those are the CRFs?
by rezwits
Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:47 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Nenya, and short events
Replies: 13
Views: 297

Re: Nenya, and short events

Any one corruption check made by a character... (this would mean ONE corruption check of my choice, or simply NEXT, up for debate) Based on our discussion, I think you meant this one to be "One corruption check made by a character...". No I am quoting Nenya on that one... Of relevance: Short-event ...
by rezwits
Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:26 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Nenya, and short events
Replies: 13
Views: 297

Nenya, and short events

I spent last week (5 days) casually building and researching a new deck idea. I looked for specific rulings on Nenya is in play.. Couldn't really find much. The way I have always played MECCG regarding resources, and in most cases short-events, my understanding has always been clear to me, and I hav...
by rezwits
Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:58 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)
Replies: 24
Views: 901

Re: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)

I agree with Konrad's 1st and initial clarification, but if need be, I can go with the 2nd one, for such things as in the case of Morgul Rats... i.e. IF what makes them playable, such as Doors or some other "scenario", then they ARE normally playable, but without said scenario, they aren't playable....
by rezwits
Tue Mar 05, 2019 4:52 am
Forum: USA MECCG Community
Topic: MECCG in Vegas!
Replies: 28
Views: 1740

Re: MECCG in Vegas!

What a great time with good friends. Got there early, with dolly loaded with whatever I had. Gandalf Gene was there, and we started a Dreamcard game for an opener while we were expecting a 3rd player to show up in few. GG was playing a Galadriel Elf-lord DC Deck, and I was playing my Gandalf FW DC D...
by rezwits
Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:25 am
Forum: Cardnum
Topic: Changelog
Replies: 5
Views: 574

Changelog 0.1.5

0.1.5
• Gameboard
MAJOR: /host is now /h, /hr is host revealed for sites, /hh is host hidden
CARD: Grasping and Ungracious
CARDS: Various MENE RW Cards

• Deckbuilder
MAJOR: Deck Notes

• Rules (Section Created)
by rezwits
Sat Feb 23, 2019 3:56 am
Forum: USA MECCG Community
Topic: MECCG in Vegas!
Replies: 28
Views: 1740

Re: MECCG in Vegas!

I am not familiar with MTG since around '98, but from your other post it seems like you build a deck on the spot from an assortment of randomly delt cards. But! More interesting I think is that you only have 1 of the non-enablers, which probably leads to unpopular cards seeing play, right? That nov...

Go to advanced search