Council of Elrond

Thanks for the games everyone. I enjoyed seeing what people put together.

Determining playability of creatures for BOCH and FSF necessarily requires the creature to be keyed . I think determining whether a creature is "playable" only requires that the creature could be keyed. That is, only the possibility of one or more valid keyings needs to be established; no actual ke...

I read neither of those as "the creature is played". In both cases, the creature must be brought into play for the creature to attack. I would say that "(not counting against the hazard limit)" is an additional clarification that supports the creature not being played. Both of these cards also stipu...

Hoarmurath is a hazard permanent-event that indicates that it gives "kill" marshalling points. It has an attack associated with it ( gives +1 strike to any one attack ). I instead read the requirement that each qualifying card has an attack associated with it as a universal statement, a property of...

The attack is not created by event, Could you explain your reasoning on that? I have no intuition for that point being contested. Combat normally occurs when one of three things happens: • When a creature hazard is played on a company. • When a company at a site with an automatic-attack decides to ...

If I understand the full motivation, I would suggest different wording for your proposal in the direction of: "An attack created by Bring Our Curses Home or Foes Shall Fall is treated as being keyed according to the hazard player's choice among possible valid ways to key the creature if it was being...

I like. Any plans to make another pass with better OCR?

CDavis7M wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:05 pm

By the way, you're misunderstanding what the complete list of errata is.

A curious statement since I did not state my own beliefs about what the complete list of errata is in my previous post. More hallucination?

CDavis7M wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:51 pm

I think so too. 60 people just made a decision without bothering to read the card. To be fair, it is the CoE's M.O.

You get to decide whether you believe your hallucinations are truth.

Since the below quote did not seem relevant to questions about rules, but seemed to be just another character attack such as we have seen numerous times against numerous people from CDavis7M, I am moving out of the subforum on Rules Questions. I understand your flawed perspective. You find one line ...

Some would say that we are saving you the nearly 2.5 months between your posts (and unknown time before the first post) to realize the unlimited print. :roll: Instead, it seems worth noting that the "complete list of errata" from ICE did not list this errata. If it isn't in the "complete list", it s...

Em-dashes are instead represented with hyphens.
Cards with parenthetical names are instead using hyphens.
Fell Winter is lacking spaces around its em-dash repaced by a hyphen: "Wolves-3 strikes with 7 prowess"

A company is an entity, not "an entity sometimes but not in this situation that the rules don't cover and in a way that contradicts norms of English". "If it isn't there..." I offered you [perspective] beyond... your wit. I have offered it again, so that those whom you mislead may clearly see the ch...

Your response exemplifies your failure at deduction.

I get the sense that you aren't actually trying to understand anything. Good luck in your future!