I noticed the card "Lure of MECCG" copyright Lure of MECCG was listed as the 500th METW card and not fan made. Is this intentional?

Theo, as you mentioned, you helped translate the cards into Spanish, but your name will gladly be removed. I thought it was the right thing to do, not that it would bother you. Although on previous occasions you had reminded me that I had forgotten to give you credit. viewtopic.php?p=42047#p42047 Y...

Thank you for offering recognition for my help (presumably for helping the Remaster Project with references for Spanish translations of cards not originally printed in Spanish). The description of the Official Cards Database does not mention the translation work, and I would like to request that my ...

Like I said I'd like rules debates to be elsewhere, so I changed the post to "All Nazgul attacks" which echoes MEBA summary and should be consistent with either side of whether the "played at/keyed to site" card texts are meant to contextualize the detainment modification narrowl...

From where "(always)" in "* Nazgul attacks (always)." ? Any Nazgul attack against a minion company is a detainment attack. MEBA summary says it even more succinctly. I don't want this thread to turn into rules debate. Van implied Nazgul could attack normally in the cases you giv...

This ruling is correct for Folco and incorrect for Strider. Note that they have different text, so rulings on Folco do not apply to Strider without justification. Here (again) are the aspects to consider for Strider: 1) The CotD (683) may be misleading. The only relevant previous message from Ichabo...

Adding a note about Sudden Call, since I find every time I play minion when I haven't for a while I forget about it.

We're planning to gather on the South side of Denver on August 10, game blocks starting at 10:30 and 1:15. If you're in this part of Colorado, ping me to join in! Our group tends to be pretty casual, and in general we tend to check in with opponents first about things like alignment and avatar and m...

Note: updated the reporting of results so that the names of deck types played are only reported at the end of the tournament.

"Set" is not the same phrase as "determined," hence MELE dropping it from its language. The company size (and base hazard limit) is indeed (normally) set by the end of the organization phase, barring Alatar jumping or Ren the Unclean corruption checks failing. So I don't think ME...

I appreciate the consideration you've put into this. I would like to disagree on a few points. Starting from a basis that the "immediately" wasn't for nothing, it could mean that the attack is NOT declared in the next chain of effects, but combat begins when the condition is satisfied, bef...

I would advocate for not making new rulings that only serve to affirm standing rulings; why not simply direct question askers to those rulings?

I agree that Ready to His Will (without loss of generality) says nothing about the ally getting any special effects of the creature, but I am concerned that it DOES specifically mention the ally getting the creature's normal prowess, which as you know is defined to include however prowess is specifi...

Agreed. I imagine Ichabod would agree too, and just overlooked that question's premise.

Is your answer to the first question changing something from ICE Digest 111, or overturning another CoE ruling made since then? Or why not simply direct the question asker to ICE Digest 111? ---------- In the case of creatures that attack from an off-to-the-side state, like Bring Our Curses Home or ...