Search found 3076 matches

by Bandobras Took
Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:16 am
Forum: Official Game Rules
Topic: Cave-drake and Tournament rules
Replies: 2
Views: 73

Re: Cave-drake and Tournament rules

"Drake" was only introduced as a creature type in ME:TD. Cave-Drake serves the purpose of having a non-unique creature that is enhanced by dragon-based hazard events. I don't think ICE ever actually changed the name of any card, so once they had chosen it, they were stuck with it. Similarl...
by Bandobras Took
Thu May 08, 2025 11:24 pm
Forum: Scenario Games
Topic: Alternate Company Limit Rules
Replies: 0
Views: 142

Alternate Company Limit Rules

This seems like the best place to put forth ideas for alternate play, so here goes: An idea struck me this morning -- what if company size were limited not by the number of characters, but by the number of MPs such characters provide? This would provide a less clunky framework for accommodating Bilb...
by Bandobras Took
Thu Apr 03, 2025 7:08 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: First of the Order
Replies: 12
Views: 3026

Re: First of the Order

My question, though, is whether First of the Order can be played during the Free Council at all. Does it count as something that will affect the corruption check, even though there is no end of turn duration during the Free Council?
by Bandobras Took
Thu Mar 27, 2025 11:32 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Prophet of Doom
Replies: 37
Views: 3363

Re: Prophet of Doom

You're right; I was misreading a couple of sentences.
by Bandobras Took
Thu Mar 27, 2025 2:56 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Prophet of Doom
Replies: 37
Views: 3363

Re: Prophet of Doom

Hidden Haven would permit it, since at that point Ettenmoors is considered a Wizardhaven. Hidden Haven would have to be played first, however. Playing Resources at a Site —In order to play a non-Fallen-wizard resource that would normally tap a site, either the site and the resource to be played mus...
by Bandobras Took
Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:58 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Prophet of Doom
Replies: 37
Views: 3363

Re: Prophet of Doom

Hidden Haven would permit it, since at that point Ettenmoors is considered a Wizardhaven. Hidden Haven would have to be played first, however. Edit: There is room for doubt in the common interpretation; Wizardhavens may possibly only be both hero and minion for the purposes of playing cards that wou...
by Bandobras Took
Sun Mar 23, 2025 10:55 pm
Forum: Online Tournaments
Topic: Rediscover Middle-Earth: The Wizards (2025)
Replies: 3
Views: 317

Re: Rediscover Middle-Earth: The Wizards (2025)

While many real-life issues have sprung up preventing me from participating, I'm fascinated by this idea. The non-existence of An Unexpected Outpost alone would be enough to really shake things up.
by Bandobras Took
Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:54 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Prophet of Doom
Replies: 37
Views: 3363

Re: Prophet of Doom

That's interesting; that means that even if Pallando is at the same site, the number of regions would be one. Ugh. This card definitely has now made it to my "Could really have been worded better" list. Under-deeps either makes the card not work or would be an instance of zero. I cannot no...
by Bandobras Took
Sun Mar 09, 2025 1:19 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Prophet of Doom
Replies: 37
Views: 3363

Re: Prophet of Doom

Is there an instance of the number of regions between two sites being zero?
by Bandobras Took
Sat Mar 01, 2025 1:58 am
Forum: play.meccg.com
Topic: On A Humorous Note . . .
Replies: 0
Views: 687

On A Humorous Note . . .

My bad luck rolling dice was not platform-specific. I can roll as hideously on this web-based version as I ever did on GCCG. :D
by Bandobras Took
Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:36 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Wizard to Fallen-wizard Conversion
Replies: 2
Views: 507

Re: Wizard to Fallen-wizard Conversion

Nothing. Nor does there really need to be. Laying aside that this is an optional rule, the massive hurdle to becoming a Fallen Wizard is that the corruption check must be equal to the corruption total or miss by one. If the corruption check succeeds, you don't become a FW. If the corruption check fa...
by Bandobras Took
Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:03 pm
Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
Topic: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
Replies: 8
Views: 1455

Re: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!

Uvatha is a good example. He currently asks if a hazard is a creature. If his text were "a hazard that is *only* a creature", then Creature/Event hazards could not be retrieved. Likewise, the FW rule checks for whether a hazard "can only attack/effect minion companies." If a haza...
by Bandobras Took
Sat Feb 22, 2025 5:34 pm
Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
Topic: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
Replies: 8
Views: 1455

Re: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!

And therefore, if FW Overt Companies were minion companies for the purposes of hazards which only required a Diplomat, nobody would argue that Gnaw With Words only required a Diplomat. Spying Out The Land says "only those hazards may be played during the company's movement/hazard phase." I...
by Bandobras Took
Sat Feb 22, 2025 3:13 pm
Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
Topic: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
Replies: 8
Views: 1455

Re: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!

Skin-Changers is not a hazard that can only attack/affect minion companies. It has an alternate use against hero companies.

Sons of Kings, Landroval, and Elves Upon Errantry are hazards that can only attack/affect minion companies.
by Bandobras Took
Fri Feb 21, 2025 7:18 pm
Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
Topic: FW Rings-For-Points Discussion
Replies: 8
Views: 1780

Re: FW Rings-For-Points Discussion

A Black Rain deck. This hampers Rolled (though is still somewhat vulnerable to Ire) by obviating the necessity of Gold Ring Items. The obvious drawbacks are the opponent simply playing his characters on-guard during the m/h phase, and the need for extra rings to keep a person safe from Rolled anywa...

Go to advanced search