Search found 3076 matches
- Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:16 am
- Forum: Official Game Rules
- Topic: Cave-drake and Tournament rules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 73
Re: Cave-drake and Tournament rules
"Drake" was only introduced as a creature type in ME:TD. Cave-Drake serves the purpose of having a non-unique creature that is enhanced by dragon-based hazard events. I don't think ICE ever actually changed the name of any card, so once they had chosen it, they were stuck with it. Similarl...
- Thu May 08, 2025 11:24 pm
- Forum: Scenario Games
- Topic: Alternate Company Limit Rules
- Replies: 0
- Views: 142
Alternate Company Limit Rules
This seems like the best place to put forth ideas for alternate play, so here goes: An idea struck me this morning -- what if company size were limited not by the number of characters, but by the number of MPs such characters provide? This would provide a less clunky framework for accommodating Bilb...
- Thu Apr 03, 2025 7:08 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: First of the Order
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3026
Re: First of the Order
My question, though, is whether First of the Order can be played during the Free Council at all. Does it count as something that will affect the corruption check, even though there is no end of turn duration during the Free Council?
- Thu Mar 27, 2025 11:32 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Prophet of Doom
- Replies: 37
- Views: 3363
Re: Prophet of Doom
You're right; I was misreading a couple of sentences.
- Thu Mar 27, 2025 2:56 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Prophet of Doom
- Replies: 37
- Views: 3363
Re: Prophet of Doom
Hidden Haven would permit it, since at that point Ettenmoors is considered a Wizardhaven. Hidden Haven would have to be played first, however. Playing Resources at a Site —In order to play a non-Fallen-wizard resource that would normally tap a site, either the site and the resource to be played mus...
- Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:58 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Prophet of Doom
- Replies: 37
- Views: 3363
Re: Prophet of Doom
Hidden Haven would permit it, since at that point Ettenmoors is considered a Wizardhaven. Hidden Haven would have to be played first, however. Edit: There is room for doubt in the common interpretation; Wizardhavens may possibly only be both hero and minion for the purposes of playing cards that wou...
- Sun Mar 23, 2025 10:55 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: Rediscover Middle-Earth: The Wizards (2025)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 317
Re: Rediscover Middle-Earth: The Wizards (2025)
While many real-life issues have sprung up preventing me from participating, I'm fascinated by this idea. The non-existence of An Unexpected Outpost alone would be enough to really shake things up.
- Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:54 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Prophet of Doom
- Replies: 37
- Views: 3363
Re: Prophet of Doom
That's interesting; that means that even if Pallando is at the same site, the number of regions would be one. Ugh. This card definitely has now made it to my "Could really have been worded better" list. Under-deeps either makes the card not work or would be an instance of zero. I cannot no...
- Sun Mar 09, 2025 1:19 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Prophet of Doom
- Replies: 37
- Views: 3363
Re: Prophet of Doom
Is there an instance of the number of regions between two sites being zero?
- Sat Mar 01, 2025 1:58 am
- Forum: play.meccg.com
- Topic: On A Humorous Note . . .
- Replies: 0
- Views: 687
On A Humorous Note . . .
My bad luck rolling dice was not platform-specific. I can roll as hideously on this web-based version as I ever did on GCCG. 

- Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:36 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Wizard to Fallen-wizard Conversion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 507
Re: Wizard to Fallen-wizard Conversion
Nothing. Nor does there really need to be. Laying aside that this is an optional rule, the massive hurdle to becoming a Fallen Wizard is that the corruption check must be equal to the corruption total or miss by one. If the corruption check succeeds, you don't become a FW. If the corruption check fa...
- Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:03 pm
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1455
Re: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
Uvatha is a good example. He currently asks if a hazard is a creature. If his text were "a hazard that is *only* a creature", then Creature/Event hazards could not be retrieved. Likewise, the FW rule checks for whether a hazard "can only attack/effect minion companies." If a haza...
- Sat Feb 22, 2025 5:34 pm
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1455
Re: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
And therefore, if FW Overt Companies were minion companies for the purposes of hazards which only required a Diplomat, nobody would argue that Gnaw With Words only required a Diplomat. Spying Out The Land says "only those hazards may be played during the company's movement/hazard phase." I...
- Sat Feb 22, 2025 3:13 pm
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1455
Re: FW Skin-Changer Immunity!
Skin-Changers is not a hazard that can only attack/affect minion companies. It has an alternate use against hero companies.
Sons of Kings, Landroval, and Elves Upon Errantry are hazards that can only attack/affect minion companies.
Sons of Kings, Landroval, and Elves Upon Errantry are hazards that can only attack/affect minion companies.
- Fri Feb 21, 2025 7:18 pm
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: FW Rings-For-Points Discussion
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1780
Re: FW Rings-For-Points Discussion
A Black Rain deck. This hampers Rolled (though is still somewhat vulnerable to Ire) by obviating the necessity of Gold Ring Items. The obvious drawbacks are the opponent simply playing his characters on-guard during the m/h phase, and the need for extra rings to keep a person safe from Rolled anywa...