I agree with no prize policy, though I have yet to restart coming to Lure (but hoping it will be every year now, with kids getting bigger)

Kindly subscribing for any and all reprints and new prints.

I certainly never stopped my opponent doing option B and never was stopped from doing option B. That being said, I am far from active tournament player last ~10 years.

Good point

I understand your point and understand your frustration at people like me, but I hate imperfect changes. If at all possible, try to stick with what is on the card is my #1 mantra. Any changes to something else are problematic, even if you have an actively played always up-to-date online representati...

I am not against the suggestion, I just feel the motivation part here is overly biased. Maybe I did not have to voice my concern, but why not give constructive criticism, when there is room for improvement? The baseline that this is GREAT AND AWESOME INITIATIVE and EXCELLENT WORK and KUDOS TO ALL WH...

"The site moved from is the surface site for Deep Mines..." is much clearer. But we probably cannot change that for this vote :( Exactly, being its own surface site, or being a representative of the surface site while there is a hypothetical Deep Mines not represented by a physical card ar...

I dislike suggesting that: "- A majority NO vote would mean that the latest printed version by ICE (Challenge Deck edition) should be used; however, it would remain unclear whether or not the CRF erratum should be applied to this version (possibly causing two Saplings to be discarded). " a...

I dislike turning down the possibility to get to Dunharrow and have another M/H phase as hinted at the official rulings. I would appreciate only half-errata for Aragorn's presence.

I disagree with the stated status quo listed (maybe it is a US status quo?). Since MEWH came out, I always played this and saw it played according to option B (throughout Europe).

To me B is both correct and the status quo.

I believe News of Doom should be saying "remove from play" not from the game, and agree with Van's ruling. Therefore I have to vote NO on otherwise nice Rule change proposal (Ballot item #7), because I believe it should correctly be changing NoD to "remove from play" similar to d...

The proposed wording "this site" is ambiguous and points to the actual Deep Mines card at first glance rather than the site that is a protected Wizardhaven. I hope this change will not go through with this wording. Please, try to come up with better wording if you want me (& possibly o...

Register

There could be a Czech group coming. The location is Czech friendly
(Unfortunately not me, as our new family member has an estimated delivery date October 25th).

Kuba

ok, I was wrong
3 events + finals is not that bad idea