Search found 4493 matches
- Fri Oct 03, 2025 2:41 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Balrog Special Items
- Replies: 4
- Views: 102
Re: Balrog Special Items
They are not weapons.
- Fri Oct 03, 2025 7:00 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Balrog Special Items
- Replies: 4
- Views: 102
Re: Balrog Special Items
Yes.
Why not?
Why not?
- Thu Oct 02, 2025 9:18 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Tapping a Nazgûl to access a sideboard
- Replies: 0
- Views: 39
Tapping a Nazgûl to access a sideboard
Tapping a Nazgûl to bring cards in from the sideboard does not turn the Nazgûl into a short-event. It is discarded immediately upon declaration. Annotation 5: If an action requires an entity to tap as a condition for the action’s main effect, that entity must be untapped when the action is declared...
- Sat Sep 20, 2025 10:36 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Forewarned is Forearmed and hero Under-deeps
- Replies: 0
- Views: 181
Forewarned is Forearmed and hero Under-deeps
Any non-Dragon Lair site with more than one automatic-attack is reduced to having one automatic-attack of the hazard player’s choice (this attack cannot be canceled). Any creature or other hazard with more than one attack is reduced to one attack of the hazard player’s choice (this attack cannot be...
- Fri Aug 22, 2025 5:40 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: A New Ringlord
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6390
Re: A New Ringlord
Unless Balrog will be imprisoned.Konrad Klar wrote: ↑Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:14 am If you end with three copies of the card on Balrog and still not win with this method, you cannot win with this method during this game.
- Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:14 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: A New Ringlord
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6390
Re: A New Ringlord
The roll is made when Challenge the Power resolves, not later. If you have two Challenge the Power on Balrog an play third copy, then only one roll is made (modified by number of other copies of the card and by number of sages in company). If you end with three copies of the card on Balrog and still...
- Thu Aug 21, 2025 11:58 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: A New Ringlord
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6390
Re: A New Ringlord
Balrog specific. Playable on The Balrog if he bears The One Ring . Make a roll adding one for each sage in his company and for each other Challenge the Power in play. If the result is: less than 7, The Balrog is eliminated; 7 or 8, discard this card; 9 or 10, you gain 2 marshalling points and The O...
- Fri Aug 08, 2025 2:56 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: The Hunt and after-attack actions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 201
Re: The Hunt and after-attack actions
Knights of the Prince is example of card that makes after-attack actions Unless the attack is canceled, all untapped characters in defending company are tapped following this attack. . For Orc, Troll, or Man attack. I did not provide any example. I wonder whether [facing of attack] as though he were...
- Fri Aug 08, 2025 10:15 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: The Hunt and after-attack actions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 201
The Hunt and after-attack actions
Playable on Alatar during the organization phase. Name a specific hazard creature card your opponent revealed to you through a mechanism of the game and discarded. Unless eliminated or prevented from being in play, your opponent then finds this particular card (reshuffling his play deck if it was s...
- Sun Jul 27, 2025 9:05 am
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: CoE Digest #210 Q7 - Doubled Vigilance
- Replies: 3
- Views: 320
Re: CoE Digest #210 Q7 - Doubled Vigilance
This means that while you could normally use Marvels Told/Voices of Malice to stop an attack from an in-play hazard’s passive condition prior to its attack resolving into combat (e.g. from an Ahunt Dragon), there is no opportunity to play them against a Doubled Vigilance revealed on-guard because t...
- Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:10 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: CoE Digest #210 Q4 - Nazgul automatic-attacks
- Replies: 2
- Views: 288
Re: CoE Digest #210 Q4 - Nazgul automatic-attacks
Detainment Attacks (clarification)—Automatic-attacks are not detainment attacks unless specifically stated on the site card. True, normal AA of Ruined Signal Tower is not detainment, but cannot become detainment in result of effect of Ungoliant's Progeny? Unique. Spawn. The Wind-deeps and The Ruste...
- Tue Jul 22, 2025 10:07 am
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: CoE Digest #210 Q1 - "For rest of the turn" effects during Free Council
- Replies: 2
- Views: 243
Re: CoE Digest #210 Q1 - "For rest of the turn" effects during Free Council
Tookish Blood and White Light Broken (in addition to First of the Order AND Magical Harp) make the whole thing worth of class action instead of correcting text of particular cards.
- Tue Jul 15, 2025 9:57 am
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: CoE Digest #210 Q3 - Removing the limit on how many characters can be played
- Replies: 3
- Views: 376
Re: CoE Digest #210 Q3 - Removing the limit on how many characters can be played
There is no limit of how many Dwarves may be brought into play on a given turn (with some company or at all) as there is no limit of how many Elves may be brought into play on a given turn. An Unexpected Party addresses a limitation that does not exist. I think that proper way of dealing with the pr...
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:40 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: CoE Digest #210 Q2 - An Untimely Brood
- Replies: 2
- Views: 319
Re: CoE Digest #210 Q2 - An Untimely Brood
I think that there is another problem with text of An Untimely Brood. "may be played" and "is playable" are not synonymous. Resource may be playable at some site even if (for some reason) may not be played here and vice versa. "One non-unique ally with a mind of 1 is playabl...
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:19 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: CoE Digest #210 Q5 - Radagast's Black Bird
- Replies: 3
- Views: 302
Re: CoE Digest #210 Q5 - Radagast's Black Bird
Some members of our community have argued that the “(tapped or untapped)” parenthetical only refers to the site card, and/or that Radagast must still be untapped even if he “need not tap himself”. If condition of some action is that a card taps then the card needs be untapped just before the condit...