Search found 2058 matches

by Konrad Klar
Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:06 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Multiple copies of the same site-card
Replies: 12
Views: 1124

Re: Multiple copies of the same site-card

Any company may declare as its new site a site already on the table. That site will remain on the table at least until the end of that company's movement/hazard phase. Nowhere is said that the site must be revealed. Unrevealed site card chosen as new site in organization phase is revealed at beginn...
by Konrad Klar
Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:21 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Multiple copies of the same site-card
Replies: 12
Views: 1124

Re: Multiple copies of the same site-card

Yes. They can.
by Konrad Klar
Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:26 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Multiple copies of the same site-card
Replies: 12
Views: 1124

Re: Multiple copies of the same site-card

1. Is the answer above given in Rulings Digest #82 completely accurate? He leaves out the possibility of splitting a company at a haven and using multiple copies of the haven for the separate companies (as quoted above in the Lidless Eye clarification). No. For reasons given by you. 2. With White Ha...
by Konrad Klar
Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:53 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Traitor
Replies: 2
Views: 44

Re: Traitor

Maybe. But for some reason a normal result of cc was originally postponed. And even with CRF there is the reference to "the character attacking". But because the same CRF paragraph says "but may still tap for full prowess" (as though tapping in strike sequence was made "for" and not in result), and ...
by Konrad Klar
Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:51 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
Replies: 5
Views: 42

Re: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects

Some correction. Declaring of Smoke on the Wind causes a declaration of: Discarding all factions playable at the site that player has in play Check for presence of untapped character in company Attack of Men 1s/10p Attack of Men 5s/8p I forgot about the last (first declared) action of Smoke on the W...
by Konrad Klar
Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:41 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
Replies: 5
Views: 42

Re: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects

The attack of ahunts are, as I understand it, actions created by passive conditions, and each would have to be their own chain of effects precisely because this rule does not allow them to be declared in response to one another. I agree that: The attack of ahunts are actions created by (triggering ...
by Konrad Klar
Sat Nov 10, 2018 4:57 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Passive Conditions
Replies: 3
Views: 42

Re: Passive Conditions

:oops:
I misread.
Accepted.
by Konrad Klar
Fri Nov 09, 2018 3:04 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Passive Conditions
Replies: 3
Views: 42

Re: Passive Conditions

It does not address the issue. Issue is how to deal with actions caused by a passive condition if some passive condition is produced not in chain of effects.
by Konrad Klar
Fri Nov 09, 2018 3:00 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
Replies: 5
Views: 42

Re: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects

Issue is just that: Annotation 10: If more than one action is required to be the first action declared in a chain of effects, the player whose turn it is chooses the order in which they are declared. No other actions may be declared in this follow-up chain until the multiple required actions have be...
by Konrad Klar
Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:21 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Traitor
Replies: 2
Views: 44

Traitor

When the next character fails a corruption check, he becomes a 'traitor, and an attack is immediately made against a character in the traitor's company. The character to be attacked is chosen by the player who does not control the traitor's company. The prowess of the attack is equal to the prowess...
by Konrad Klar
Thu Nov 08, 2018 1:48 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Passive Conditions
Replies: 3
Views: 42

Passive Conditions

1. Annotation 9: If a card specifies that an action is to occur as a result of some specific passive condition, this action becomes automatically the first action declared in the chain of effects to immediately follow the chain of effects producing the passive condition . The passive condition must ...
by Konrad Klar
Thu Nov 08, 2018 1:24 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Chambers in the Royal Court
Replies: 0
Views: 19

Chambers in the Royal Court

Gandalf specific. Playable on one of your hero Free-hold [-me_fh-] sites in play. This site becomes a Wizardhaven [W] for your companies, loses all automatic-attacks against your companies, and is one of Gandalf's home sites. Nothing is considered playable as written on the site card. If one of you...
by Konrad Klar
Thu Nov 08, 2018 1:19 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Mischief in a Mean Way
Replies: 0
Views: 21

Mischief in a Mean Way

Playable during the site phase on a Border-hold [-me_bh-] site if you have 10 or more stage points. This site becomes one of your Wizardhavens [W] and loses all automatic-attacks. Nothing is considered playable as written on the site. If one of your companies is at this site, all attacks against it...
by Konrad Klar
Thu Nov 08, 2018 1:12 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Hidden Haven
Replies: 0
Views: 17

Hidden Haven

Playable on a non-Dragon's lair Ruins & Lairs [-me_rl-] in a Wilderness [-me_wi-] , Border-land [-me_bl-] , or Shadow-land [-me_sl-] ; the site must normally be a Ruins & Lairs [-me_rl-] . The site becomes one of your Wizardhavens [W] and loses all automatic-attacks. Nothing is considered playable ...
by Konrad Klar
Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:59 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Swag
Replies: 0
Views: 20

Swag

Playable on a company at a tapped Ruins & Lairs [-me_rl-] , Border-hold [-me_bh-] , or Free-hold [-me_fh-] . During the site phase, one or two characters in that company may each tap to take control of a non-unique, non-hoard minor item of the following type: weapon, armor, shield, or helmet. You m...

Go to advanced search