Search found 2626 matches

by Konrad Klar
Tue Aug 20, 2019 4:25 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Dragons
Replies: 16
Views: 590

Re: Dragons

This proposed errata has significant drawbacks (time, confusion, etc) and such minimal benefits (potentially boosting the ego the handful of Rules Lawyers). Some areas of formal systems (like mathematics, programming languages) are developed, even if there is no known practical applications for the...
by Konrad Klar
Tue Aug 20, 2019 3:28 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Despair of the Heart vs Allies
Replies: 5
Views: 48

Re: Despair of the Heart vs Allies

While allies count as characters for some purposes, they do not cease to be allies and resources at any time. They can (while counting as characters for some purposes) perform actions that character can do for the purposes, but still suffer limitations of allies and resources. Allies do not make cor...
by Konrad Klar
Tue Aug 20, 2019 7:43 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Dragons
Replies: 16
Views: 590

Re: Dragons

@CDavis7M If erratas would be applied to original manual then the problem of overwhelming number of erratas would be solved. Reader of the manual with most recent patch applied, would have access to most recent state of rules. If it is too ambitious project, then at least CRF file should be consider...
by Konrad Klar
Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:44 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

Theo wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:42 am
In my opinion, the canceling action is only played out through "the effects", and so Tom only needs to target those.
Tom cancels all effects of X, but the X must target a company moving through listed regions.
In my opinion.

X may be itself effect o thef X.
by Konrad Klar
Mon Aug 12, 2019 8:14 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

Or Baduila could return your own company traveling to a Darkhaven back to its home site as a sort of generalized Farmer Maggot attack avoidance. That would actually be cool. :idea: If this is bug (not feature) it should be fixed at the level of the text of the card (that already has been fixed in p...
by Konrad Klar
Sun Aug 11, 2019 8:11 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

Hazards may only be played on a company whose movement/hazard phase is being resolved, or on the site they are moving to. Long-events and permanent-events may effect more than one company even though they are only played "on" one company. I appreciate the fact that last "on" is put between quotatio...
by Konrad Klar
Sat Aug 10, 2019 7:48 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

I think that canceled may be only ongoing effect (including a process, like an attack).
A result applied to some object may be reverted.

P.S. This means that I agree with you.
by Konrad Klar
Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:55 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

Question is whether already applied result may be canceled at all.
If so, there is chance of returning to play eliminated characters.

(petition to change the name Tom Bombadil to The Necromancer...)
by Konrad Klar
Sat Aug 10, 2019 5:28 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

If an effect of short-event is not an attack, I do not see a method of canceling it other than canceling it as whole and before it will resolve. But Tom Bombadil has no ability to cancel an effect merely declared. In practice he is limited to canceling attacks (from hazard that targets company) and ...
by Konrad Klar
Sat Aug 10, 2019 1:48 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

Both, I think.
Inference.
by Konrad Klar
Sat Aug 10, 2019 7:09 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

Yes.
by Konrad Klar
Fri Aug 09, 2019 7:13 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Open to the Summons
Replies: 23
Views: 627

Re: Open to the Summons

I know that question was about character.
But some answers have little to do with questions (and are not backed by any logic).
by Konrad Klar
Fri Aug 09, 2019 5:29 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Open to the Summons
Replies: 23
Views: 627

Re: Open to the Summons

My interpretation would prevent a player from playing Bounty of the Hoard without actually playing an item using it. Some cards that allow playing an extra resource require having the resource in hand. Some do bot. Also, how do you guys feel about 7-mind agents being played by Fallen Wizards by lay...
by Konrad Klar
Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:58 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Open to the Summons
Replies: 23
Views: 627

Re: Open to the Summons

I think that ICE has tried to express "you cannot play a card if its conditions do not exist".

Some cards are so constructed that it can never be excluded that they will have some effect at resolution.

EDIT: condition -> conditions
by Konrad Klar
Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:48 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb
Replies: 58
Views: 2917

Re: pilfer vs leaflock/tom bomb

Even then, both are conditions, not actions (I still believe that discarding the Ranger is a condition of seek) Because you are ignoring a difference between "discard X" and "discard X to". You can't declare the attacks from Tempest of Fire without also declaring the tapping of the site, but that d...

Go to advanced search