Additional.
From where the concept " it overrides the +2 stated on the Fell Rider"?
Search found 4542 matches
- Thu Sep 10, 2026 12:30 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: When playing a fell rider what prowess bonus counts
- Replies: 2
- Views: 23
- Thu Sep 10, 2026 12:29 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Moria (Minion)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 11
- Thu Sep 10, 2026 12:26 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Minion Scroll of Isildur may only be stored at Barad-Dur
- Replies: 3
- Views: 21
Re: Minion Scroll of Isildur may only be stored at Barad-Dur
"nowhere" is not a new option for minion Scroll of Isildur. The card is one of the cards that state that they can be stored when at a specific site . I am not a dictator. I think that Other cards may not be stored is a mistake. It should be "Other non-item cards may not be stored"...
- Thu Sep 10, 2026 6:09 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Faction Trophies. Are they euivalent to creature T's for bonusses
- Replies: 2
- Views: 11
Re: Faction Trophies. Are they euivalent to creature T's for bonusses
Which?Gamling the Old wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2026 5:45 pm Some factions can be placed as Trophy under an Orc leader.
CRF, Rulings by Term, Dragons wrote:If you defeat the attack from a Dragon manifestation, you get kill marshalling points
from the manifestation as if you had defeated a creature.
CRF, Rulings by Term, Trophies wrote:Defeated Dragon manifestations can be used as trophies, including Dragon factions.
- Thu Sep 10, 2026 5:59 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Minion Scroll of Isildur may only be stored at Barad-Dur
- Replies: 3
- Views: 21
Re: Minion Scroll of Isildur may only be stored at Barad-Dur
1. Opponent says, it can ONLY be stored at Barad-Dur. So the 'may' is a hard choice (so better would have been 'Must') So demand consistency from him. And to apply the same reasoning for Sapling of the White Tree and Book of Mazarbul. For Sapling of the White Tree, this would mean, among others, tha...
- Wed Sep 02, 2026 7:25 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Can a company with 2 leaders move between havens
- Replies: 2
- Views: 59
Re: Can a company with 2 leaders move between havens
If a company is in a moving state, then it is not at a haven. So this is a violation of the rule. P.S. Not sure whether such a company may use the Bill the Pony's ability, even if the destination site is Wizardhaven. E.g. a company with two leaders is at The White Towers and has to be moved to Riven...
- Tue Sep 01, 2026 1:04 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Risky Blow, Bold Thrust do not affect a body check?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 108
Re: Risky Blow, Bold Thrust do not affect a body check?
I believe that a body of character wounded by a strike should be affected by Risky Blow, Bold Thrust. But I also think that it should be clear which activities belong to a strike and which do not. "Following each strike sequence resulting in a successful or failed strike" instead "Fol...
- Fri Aug 28, 2026 8:09 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Carambor movement to Haven
- Replies: 4
- Views: 69
Re: Carambor movement to Haven
Site Path, Site’s : The sequence of region type listed on a site’s card. Site Path, Company’s: The sequence of region (by name and by type) through which a moving company moves. Most effects that refer to a site path mean a company’s site path. However, you must be sure to recognize those effects t...
- Fri Aug 28, 2026 6:55 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Carambor movement to Haven
- Replies: 4
- Views: 69
Re: Carambor movement to Haven
There is a company's site path and a site's site path. The obvious background is the Carambor-Carrosell between a Fallen-Haven (The White Towers) and a Hidden/Guarded Haven Weathertop. You walk in between (1 wilderness), make sure Carambor untaps in a haven and thus can repeat infinetly.... Its comp...
- Thu Aug 20, 2026 11:04 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Risky Blow, Bold Thrust do not affect a body check?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 108
Risky Blow, Bold Thrust do not affect a body check?
Warrior only against one strike. +3 to prowess and -1 to body. Warrior only. Warrior receives +3 to prowess and -1 to body against one strike. Annotation 19: Following each successful strike or failed strike, a body check must be rolled (unless the failed strike has no body). However, if the strike...
- Wed Aug 19, 2026 12:27 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Assassin MP after Dark Quarrel cancels attacks
- Replies: 1
- Views: 91
Re: Assassin MP after Dark Quarrel cancels attacks
DEFEATING AN ATTACK An attack by a hazard creature is defeated if it is not a detainment attack and all of its strikes directed against (i.e., assigned to) a company are defeated. If a hazard creature has multiple attacks, each must be defeated in order for the creature to be defeated. If even one ...
- Sat Aug 15, 2026 8:29 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Balrog of Moria
- Replies: 2
- Views: 115
Re: Balrog of Moria
I wonder whether "+2 prowess to all automatic-attacks at sites in Hollin, Redhorn Gate, and Wold & Foothills." depends on the presence of Galadriel in play/at Lórien. After all, the texts are in the same paragraph.
- Fri Aug 14, 2026 11:31 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Thrall of Voice on a low-mind starting character
- Replies: 2
- Views: 129
Re: Thrall of Voice on a low-mind starting character
Other explanation (I think that it is formally correct) is that characters with mind 1-5 are allowed as long as they are not normal; Agents, Orcs, Trolls. But it is not the case in the game. If there would be a requirement that for "Instead of X the Y is used" such that Y must be differen...
- Thu Aug 13, 2026 9:18 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Playing Hazard on eliminated company
- Replies: 5
- Views: 165
Re: Playing Hazard on eliminated company
For any action.
If a company does not exist anymore, then no action may be declared in its M/H phase.
If a company does not exist anymore, then no action may be declared in its M/H phase.
- Wed Aug 12, 2026 9:32 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Playing Hazard on eliminated company
- Replies: 5
- Views: 165
Re: Playing Hazard on eliminated company
Nazgûl permanent-event is played against (rather than on) a company.
But if the company does not exist, it cannot be played against it.
But if the company does not exist, it cannot be played against it.
