mmhh... the only thing that I suggest is to use a general "logic" rule about weapons and item in general, so I would remove the bonus for Hobbits. Sting is an elvish-blade created before the events of The Fellowship, and it was not made specifically for Hobbits, so what's the meaning of th...

I don't know (or remember) if this item appears in some books, but maybe a version like this could be more playable (using the same idea of the original one): BOW OF DRAGON-HORN 2 MP - Major item Unique. Hoard item. Warrior only: tap bow to reduce the number of strikes from one hazard creature attac...

I also have the doubt that can be too strong, but I like the idea of -1 strike to a Dragon At Home manifestation.
maybe it can be used in an other virtualization or for a dream card

I think black arrow is good enough...so why make a V-card about it? I think that you would virtualize a card if: 1) it's very poor and unused 2) it's not in line with Tolkien's works As I said before, Black Arrow & Bard are already good for the game, so this is the second case. I don't like the...

Very good!
The only doubt is if it can be too strong starting with An Unexpected Party, but I like it: it's thematical, logical and original and Thorsten suggestion fits perfect!

Ops! posting here & there I didn't see your answers :shock: If you have [V]Bard the Bowman with a Black Arrow and use an Old Thrush against a Dragon attack, the Dragon attack will be at -6/-6. You're right, but this solution seems to me a way to make dragon killable (for Bard) rather than a bett...

Spider of Morlat gives +1 strike to spiders too, so it isnt THAT strong Sorry, I was not clear enough. I was thinking that Spider Of Morlat (the version I prefer) cannot attack directly when in play: you must return it in hand and play it as creature (2 HL) and in this way it cannot receive its own...

mmhh... maybe the Spider Of Morlat effect plus the shelob effect can be too strong (we should try)... however I like it!
Without this virtualization The Great Goblin is very bad and unusuable

I would say its maybe better to reduce it to automatic attacks, cause I fear there will be too much exceptions to the rule. There are other cards about auto-attacks that are actually used, so I agree to create a virtualization about hazard creatures. About exceptions, the "non unique" cla...

However, in terms of roleplay, I can easily picture RWs going out of their way to kill things that irritate them. Ok, but an orc attack (or whatever you want) vs a RW represents an orc that attack the RW and not viceversa. What you have described (that I agree) would be a Nazgul attack vs a minion ...

I still prefer -1 strike at full prowess to -1 prowess to the full attack about this there are 2 point to consider: 1) attack with only 1 strike. I think you must add "-1 strike (to a minimum of one)" that's one of the few guideline in MECCG texts. So creatures like Orc or Uruk Lieutenant...

I like this card! :P ...but maybe on Balance of thing is not so broken (or you add the exception for roleplay reason?). The only thing that I found strange is "on Will of Sauron or" cause on that card you can already play "In Darkness Bind Them" without the specification and it's...

This cards has its possibilities, but is dangerous, as snowstorm and long winter/foul fumes with this card can cause for a serious NPE. This is not a problem cause the text says "non environment"... Jambo was prevident :wink: Maybe you can add "Playable only if Doors Of Night is in p...

Yes, I also prefer Leon's version, but you'd have to add "Cannot be Duplicated." Dho! We forgot it! So the ultimate version is [V] A Lie in Your Eyes Permanent event Any non unique detainment attack against non ringwraith company attacks normally with -1 prowess. Discard this card if such...

Maia will all be 1@10 I don't understand... maia are 2@13/9 so they become 1@13/9. 2 strikes for saruman and with Alatar in play... 2@14/9!!! And I agree with Jambo about killing Maia in order to prevent opponent's Avatar. and as said before... Gandalf vs Elrond!?! I agree about mistake but... I do...