Search found 1128 matches

by the JabberwocK
Sat Jul 06, 2019 9:53 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification
Replies: 86
Views: 14211

Re: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification

However, scouring the CoE digests (up to 119) on meccg.net I cannot find any corroboration of the underlined portion, but only the following reference to concurrent uses of Thrall of the Voice on the same character. So we would be issuing a possible counter-clarification to a NetRep ruling that doe...
by the JabberwocK
Sat Jul 06, 2019 9:24 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Under-deeps (The Wind Throne)
Replies: 7
Views: 2344

Re: Under-deeps (The Wind Throne)

I propose the following changes: "With the addition of the sites in Balrog, The Wind Throne is now the surface site of an Under-deeps site." I don't feel this is really necessary. But if the Wind Throne was a Wizardhaven, I think it should still be considered adjacent to an Under-deeps site. Simila...
by the JabberwocK
Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:59 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Traitor
Replies: 8
Views: 3318

Re: Traitor

What original text would you point to that you think indicates that the character is the attacking entity? This... When the next character fails a corruption check, he becomes a 'traitor, ... plus common sense. If the character is not attacking, what is happening? Speaking for myself, I largely pla...
by the JabberwocK
Sat Jul 06, 2019 7:24 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Traitor
Replies: 8
Views: 3318

Re: Traitor

I think the original card text is pretty clear actually. The idea of the card has been changed - an attack is created but character is no longer an attacking entity. The character was never the attacking entity, just the traitor. The attack is "by" the Traitor card, which the CRF erratas to take on ...
by the JabberwocK
Sat Jul 06, 2019 6:39 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Passive Conditions
Replies: 41
Views: 6225

Re: Passive Conditions

Proposed regulation: If some a passive condition is produced not in chain of effects, then a new chain of effects is started and an action caused by the passive condition becomes automatically the first action declared in the chain of effects. Will you please provide a specific gameplay example for...
by the JabberwocK
Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:04 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: MPs for Trophies
Replies: 16
Views: 6171

Re: MPs for Trophies

One could argue that the original post CRF reference is the only provision for trophies, as trophies, being worth Marshalling Points. But I could also see this going the other way. I see. I would argue that "Creatures whose marshalling points are listed with an * give marshalling points while used ...
by the JabberwocK
Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:28 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Desire All for Thy Belly (clarification)
Replies: 4
Views: 1023

Re: Desire All for Thy Belly (clarification)

Who says? Sometimes it is bad company composition that forces a return to site of origin. Which disallowed state takes precedence? Fair enough. Nonetheless, my thoughts are the same as posted in the Aware of Their Ways topic. The odds of this happening are so slim that I have a hard time thinking i...
by the JabberwocK
Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:21 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Bring Our Curses Home + Ahunts
Replies: 24
Views: 4359

Re: Bring Our Curses Home + Ahunts

I'm not sure how this was so confusing... :? Apologies. I'm trying to absorb 100 proposals at the same time, so sometimes I forget something I read, mis-read something, or don't understand in the moment what is being suggested. Please bear with me. I will ask direct questions when needed to save ti...
by the JabberwocK
Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:04 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: WITHDRAWN: Aware of Their Ways (clarification)
Replies: 10
Views: 2473

Re: Aware of Their Ways (clarification)

"So you're telling me there's a chance!" .... Dumb and Dumber Man, it just seems like the odds of all of this happening are so slim: - Fallen-wizard player using both Orcs/Trolls and Elves/Dwarves/Dunedain - Fallen-wizard player moving conflicting race companies to the same site (or one company leav...
by the JabberwocK
Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:45 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
Replies: 11
Views: 3076

Re: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects

Did you mean "that Annotation 10 spells out the exception to Annotation 15"? Yes, sorry. I must have fat-fingered my phone and hit 1 instead of 5. :oops: Corrected above. For me "X must happen" and "X cannot happen" is conflict. Have you ever heard the saying "rules are meant to be broken"? Almost ...
by the JabberwocK
Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:28 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Fallen Wizard MPs for Palantirs
Replies: 29
Views: 8206

Re: Fallen Wizard MPs for Palantirs

Thanks for the nice discussion guys.
by the JabberwocK
Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:16 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Reversion of Site Types
Replies: 14
Views: 4822

Re: Reversion of Site Types

@ Theo -

I'm not sure I'm completely clear on what you're saying. Are you saying, for example, that if 2 copies of Heart Grown Cold are in play, that simply removing the original copy will not make sites revert back?
by the JabberwocK
Wed Jun 26, 2019 2:26 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
Replies: 11
Views: 3076

Re: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects

I do not see Annotation 15 and Annotation 10 being in conflict. It seems to me that Annotation 10 spells out the exception to Annotation 11 Annotation 15.

i.e. This is not allowed to happen, but if it does happen, this is what you do about it...
by the JabberwocK
Wed Jun 26, 2019 2:20 pm
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Reversion of Site Types
Replies: 14
Views: 4822

Re: Reversion of Site Types

Okay thank you. You are right, it is possible to “remove a card from play” that is not currently on the playing surface, so I like your addition of the “active” qualifier.

I have amended my OP proposal to include this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by the JabberwocK
Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:01 am
Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Effects of a using a Palantír (clarification)
Replies: 10
Views: 1663

Re: Effects of a using a Palantír (clarification)

As for your point at hand, I believe what you desire is the point of a Rules Summary . But the rules themselves should be mechanically consistent. Note that historically, for example, specific errata was issued for all four of the cards that removed the region in which a Guarded Haven is located fr...

Go to advanced search