These are the three main issues getting solved right now in the IA development:
- IA drawing hands
- IA drawing teeth
- IA generating MECCG decks

That swords seems oddly familiar to me...

By the way, there is an easy answer to the question about playing Mount Slain after using a nazgul as an automatic-attack. I wasn't looking for it but I found it. But just knowing that it's there should be help enough. Well, I didn't find it, so that's why I asked. Look-Shoot policy (look for a rul...

CRF, Rulings by Term, Under-deeps wrote: Creatures revealed as automatic-attacks do not count as creatures. Well, somehow this was hidden in plain sight for me. Thanks a lot, Konrad, that solves the issue for me (as play a creature as AA, reveal a creature as AA or use a Nazgûl permanent event as A...

I'm trying to make sense to the wording of this under-deeps site cards, as "use" is not a strict term in the rules (it's used on certain cards as "be able of employ", more or less, as in the magic-users, or being able to use a palantir or the Armory). The "play a criature&qu...

Permanent events do not attack, they create attacks (some as creature, as Ahunts, some as AA, as At Homes, maybe others?). Using a Nazgûl as AA makes me think that they become creatures, because as permanent events are unable to attack.

Because Out of the Black Sky works that way? It's a good example of a mechanic that mutates a Nazgûl played as permanent-event on an attack (stated as creature attack).

Ok, all understood, it's as I imagined (sorry for answering so late, BTW).
Secons question: Can I play Mount Slain on a failed strike from a Nazgûl used as an AA (as in certain underdeeps sites)? Or is there any change in his "status" as creature that prevents it?

Hello everyone: Mordakai here. I started playing this wonderful game back in 1998, left it for some years due to intense work needs, and came back to it in 2012, with a total of around 20 years of experience on it. I'm kind of an experimental player, and competitive decks are not my jam. My best ran...

Interesting that, once more, game mechanics go against Tolkien works, as Thorin did exactly that, take advantage of other guy's dragon killing work to post himself as King Under the Mountain

I fail to understand what is happening here. After a very long period without any rules arbiter, finally someone has taken the floor and... this happens? CDavis, I don't think anybody here doubts your knowledge of the game, but luckily you are not the only one, there are plenty of people here that s...

Yeah, I was only assuming that, if at Irerock, it would be prefearable to declare it before, so you have to face the AA and then (probably) get butchered, AND after that, no way of influencing the thing. I know the revealing-on-guard-at-home-dragon is a kind of not clear thing (and another different...

Interesting thought, indeed... I assume you are presenting this situation as an on-guard card in other place different to Irerock, as in Irerock you would reveal it before the influence attempt (as ir creates and additional AAin that site), is that correct?

Yeah, totally agree with that, but that was not my only point. Card carrying can be difficult when travelling by plane or even by train. Constructing a new deck for finals will hamper or directly cancel your participation in the Drinking game. Keeping decks will probably reward the most solid ones, ...

I've played about... 50 games with mulligan or so, and the rule is welcomed among the community. No mulligan fron any player is quite uncommon, I think. In most games, at least one of the players uses mulligan. Forcing the dice roll after that decission it's the key to balance its use. If you draw a...