Search found 1131 matches
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 11:56 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Agents and Havens
- Replies: 28
- Views: 17246
Re: Agents and Havens
Please give thoughts on this proposal (rough draft): First, nullify the following CRF: Only Elven agents can move to a site that is a Wizardhaven. Second, change this CRF: Agents may not move to any version of a hero Haven, unless they have a special ability allowing them to. To This: Unless they ha...
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 10:46 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Adûnaphel
- Replies: 23
- Views: 12600
Re: Adûnaphel
As a general rule, I don't feel there is a need to issue an erratum (in agreement) of every issue that the NetRep has already ruled on, and therefore I am typically against this practice (and no, I don't want to re-open the conversation of judicial vs legislative branches). However, due to the extre...
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 10:38 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Twilight
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6370
Re: Twilight
What exactly would be changing in terms of gameplay with your proposal?
Are you saying there is a notable difference between "played at any point" and "played at any time"?
Are you saying there is a notable difference between "played at any point" and "played at any time"?
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 9:53 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification
- Replies: 86
- Views: 43254
Re: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification
However, scouring the CoE digests (up to 119) on meccg.net I cannot find any corroboration of the underlined portion, but only the following reference to concurrent uses of Thrall of the Voice on the same character. So we would be issuing a possible counter-clarification to a NetRep ruling that doe...
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 9:24 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Under-deeps (The Wind Throne)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5815
Re: Under-deeps (The Wind Throne)
I propose the following changes: "With the addition of the sites in Balrog, The Wind Throne is now the surface site of an Under-deeps site." I don't feel this is really necessary. But if the Wind Throne was a Wizardhaven, I think it should still be considered adjacent to an Under-deeps si...
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:59 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Traitor
- Replies: 39
- Views: 14187
Re: Traitor
What original text would you point to that you think indicates that the character is the attacking entity? This... When the next character fails a corruption check, he becomes a 'traitor, ... plus common sense. If the character is not attacking, what is happening? Speaking for myself, I largely pla...
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 7:24 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Traitor
- Replies: 39
- Views: 14187
Re: Traitor
I think the original card text is pretty clear actually. The idea of the card has been changed - an attack is created but character is no longer an attacking entity. The character was never the attacking entity, just the traitor. The attack is "by" the Traitor card, which the CRF erratas t...
- Sat Jul 06, 2019 6:39 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Passive Conditions
- Replies: 41
- Views: 20169
Re: Passive Conditions
Proposed regulation: If some a passive condition is produced not in chain of effects, then a new chain of effects is started and an action caused by the passive condition becomes automatically the first action declared in the chain of effects. Will you please provide a specific gameplay example for...
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 5:04 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: MPs for Trophies
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13267
Re: MPs for Trophies
One could argue that the original post CRF reference is the only provision for trophies, as trophies, being worth Marshalling Points. But I could also see this going the other way. I see. I would argue that "Creatures whose marshalling points are listed with an * give marshalling points while ...
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:28 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Desire All for Thy Belly (clarification)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3710
Re: Desire All for Thy Belly (clarification)
Who says? Sometimes it is bad company composition that forces a return to site of origin. Which disallowed state takes precedence? Fair enough. Nonetheless, my thoughts are the same as posted in the Aware of Their Ways topic. The odds of this happening are so slim that I have a hard time thinking i...
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:21 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Bring Our Curses Home + Ahunts
- Replies: 24
- Views: 12798
Re: Bring Our Curses Home + Ahunts
I'm not sure how this was so confusing... :? Apologies. I'm trying to absorb 100 proposals at the same time, so sometimes I forget something I read, mis-read something, or don't understand in the moment what is being suggested. Please bear with me. I will ask direct questions when needed to save ti...
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 4:04 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN: Aware of Their Ways (clarification)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5540
Re: Aware of Their Ways (clarification)
"So you're telling me there's a chance!" .... Dumb and Dumber Man, it just seems like the odds of all of this happening are so slim: - Fallen-wizard player using both Orcs/Trolls and Elves/Dwarves/Dunedain - Fallen-wizard player moving conflicting race companies to the same site (or one co...
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:45 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7217
Re: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
Did you mean "that Annotation 10 spells out the exception to Annotation 15"? Yes, sorry. I must have fat-fingered my phone and hit 1 instead of 5. :oops: Corrected above. For me "X must happen" and "X cannot happen" is conflict. Have you ever heard the saying "rul...
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:28 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Fallen Wizard MPs for Palantirs
- Replies: 29
- Views: 16808
Re: Fallen Wizard MPs for Palantirs
Thanks for the nice discussion guys.
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 3:16 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Reversion of Site Types
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9927
Re: Reversion of Site Types
@ Theo -
I'm not sure I'm completely clear on what you're saying. Are you saying, for example, that if 2 copies of Heart Grown Cold are in play, that simply removing the original copy will not make sites revert back?
I'm not sure I'm completely clear on what you're saying. Are you saying, for example, that if 2 copies of Heart Grown Cold are in play, that simply removing the original copy will not make sites revert back?