Search found 456 matches
- Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:59 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Back from (long, unannounced, painful) holiday
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6305
- Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:30 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: III. GCCG Nations Cup 2009 (Rules/Pairings/Results)
- Replies: 153
- Views: 90069
- Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:12 am
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: III. GCCG Nations Cup 2009 (Rules/Pairings/Results)
- Replies: 153
- Views: 90069
- Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:06 pm
- Forum: Everything Else
- Topic: Time Limit in Nations Cup
- Replies: 67
- Views: 34692
I agree with the arguments exposed by Bruce, but I guess that this is a matter of preferences. While all that stuff about possible interruptions is true, it is also true that the same players can agree to extend the time limit if someone was away from the computer for some reason (such as wife calli...
- Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:03 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: III. GCCG Nations Cup 2009 (Talk)
- Replies: 76
- Views: 55396
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:20 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: III. GCCG Nations Cup 2009 (Talk)
- Replies: 76
- Views: 55396
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:47 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: III. GCCG Nations Cup 2009 (Talk)
- Replies: 76
- Views: 55396
I personally despise the experienced players that take 15 minutes for each of their organization phases, 5 minutes to think what to discard, and a long etc. For nOObs, I can understand, but for experienced players... It's completely unfair for the following reasons: 1 - One player consumes 80% of th...
- Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:18 am
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: III. GCCG Nations Cup 2009 (Talk)
- Replies: 76
- Views: 55396
- Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:32 pm
- Forum: Odds, Ends & Hobbit Holes
- Topic: Saving the Game Letter - Problems & Possible Solutions
- Replies: 33
- Views: 42007
- Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:25 pm
- Forum: Odds, Ends & Hobbit Holes
- Topic: Tournament Frustration, AKA A response to Joe's letter.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 9287
This is a more delicated issue than it seems. If cards/rules are to be changed, who will decide it? As we can see, there are several different opinions about what should be changed and how. This same discussion has been brought in the spanish Council of Rivendell forum; it seems like the metagame is...
- Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Await the Advent of Allies
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12346
I am not so sure that having the character at a haven is a requisite for playing the card. Maybe, helped by some interpretation, it's somehow implicit in the text of the card, but it's not worded that way. In the same fashion, it's not worded that you can't play it on a moving character. It only say...
- Tue Oct 28, 2008 6:25 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Await the Advent of Allies
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12346
Await the Advent of Allies
Lately there has been some discussion about this card, both in this forum and also in the spanish forum. Playable on a non-Wizard character with a mind of six or less.Character must stay at its current non-Havensite until you play a card at the site. Target character does not count against general i...
- Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:52 pm
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Responding to On-Guard Heedless
- Replies: 13
- Views: 12283
- Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:45 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: MECCG GCCG World Championships November 15.-16.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 11915
- Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:08 am
- Forum: Rules and Rulings - NetRep Discussion Forum
- Topic: Long Dark Reach vs Stealth
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7266
Long Dark Reach vs Stealth
Some discussion about this stuff has been brought to the meccg forums lately: http://www.meccg.net/dforum/viewtopic.php?t=652 (check this link for some documentation) Apparently, it's very unfortunate that the CRF used the word "play" in there. In my view, you arent playing a creature, but...