Search found 1131 matches
- Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:09 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company
- Replies: 50
- Views: 24503
Re: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company
I also think Secret Passage is perhaps a bad example to use? Does it matter in the case of Secret Passage whether it resolves before or after the Ahunt Dragon and Snowstorm? Either way, the hazard player may not play any hazard creatures on the company. Obviously the hazard player may not play any ...
- Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:37 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
- Replies: 30
- Views: 19970
Re: Icy Touch (clarification)
@ Theo - Do I have that right? This was not answered. Please confirm. Also... is this the only corruption card that has this problem? Any placed corruption currently can be stacked on the same character in one turn, in addition to another corruption card played. Example: 3x Nazgul attacks, each with...
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 10:44 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification
- Replies: 86
- Views: 43366
Re: Thrall of the Voice: multiple on character clarification
Alternatively, CoE hosts their own copy of the CRF with such offenders omitted. :P Indeed, however, the new URD being constructed will incorporate most of the CRF, as well as ICE Digests and NetRep rulings. So in theory this should take care of the issue. Still, would be nice to have a cleaned up, ...
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 6:34 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: MPs for Trophies
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13280
Re: MPs for Trophies
I think you are confusing Orc and Troll characters/companies rules and player scoring rules. You are right, my apologies. After going back and carefully re-reading CoE Erratum # 31, the MELE Rulebook, and the MEWH Rulebook, I rescind my previous opinion. I agree that clarifying this point is worthw...
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 4:33 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Distribution of Direct Influence
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5116
Re: Distribution of Direct Influence
Here is a quote from one old question on the issue: Direct Influence - Thrain II is controlling a 5 mind dwarf which uses all of his available direct influence (2 points of general and 3 points specific towards dwarves and dwarf factions). If he attempts to bring in a dwarf faction, will he get the ...
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 3:39 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.
- Replies: 33
- Views: 21496
Re: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.
So the idea is to directly overturn the following from MEWH, correct? However, you may only use a character if his mind attribute is 5 or less. Essentially, yes, but directly... no. My proposal is for erratum to the CRF as mentioned earlier in this topic. Technically it would not be an erratum of t...
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 5:12 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.
- Replies: 33
- Views: 21496
Re: Fallen-wizards using characters with > 5 mind.
Thanks for the contributions guys. FYI, there is also a NetRep ruling that supports the idea that FW's may use characters with >5 mind once in play: NetRep Rulings Digest #41 Am I allowed to discard a Thrall of the Voice on a 6-mind character during my organization phase (to lower my SP in the face ...
- Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:27 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Order of an actions caused by effects of cards not in play
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7245
Re: Order of an actions caused by effects of cards not in play
Is it possible to combine this proposal with this one: https://councilofelrond.org/forum/viewt ... 145&t=3729
since they address very similar issues?
since they address very similar issues?
- Tue Jul 09, 2019 12:06 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Actions created by playing an item
- Replies: 25
- Views: 15251
Re: Actions created by playing an item
Will you please provide an example or two which illustrate the problem and what is being fixed with the regulation proposed? Thank you.
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:51 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company
- Replies: 50
- Views: 24503
Re: Effects played during the organization phase, and depend on the site or site path of a moving company
Proposed regulation: "For purpose of timing an effects played during the organization phase that depend on the site or site path of a moving company are treated as action caused by passive condition." I would like to confirm... your proposal, if passed, would mean the hazard player gets t...
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 10:21 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Errata: Placing Corruption Cards
- Replies: 28
- Views: 15129
Re: Placing Corruption Cards
I suspect your can of worms would break many things. The CRF defines Play as being from your hand by default. All cards that have placement effects after already being in play would need errata. Thrall of the Voice and Open to the Summons are some examples that come to mind. Lots of Fallen Wizard a...
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 10:02 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Annotation 26
- Replies: 21
- Views: 10869
Re: Annotation 26
Konrad - Will you please provide a couple actual examples where your proposed change would be applicable?
Thanks
Thanks
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 9:52 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Icy Touch (errata + clarification)
- Replies: 30
- Views: 19970
Re: Icy Touch (clarification)
So there is errata in this thread. I propose the following erratum: "The prowess of one Undead attack is modified by +1. Corruption. The next character wounded by the attack (on whom a corruption card can otherwise be played) receives 2 corruption points (place this card with the character; th...
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:03 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Submission Rules - Please Read
- Replies: 20
- Views: 17942
Re: Submission Rules - Please Read
... - All new topics created in this forum should be made only to recommend a rule erratum or clarification for the upcoming 2019 Annual Rules Vote (to take place in June 2019). The deadline for submissions is TBD, but will likely be sometime in March or April of 2019. ... Hi Guys. Are there any up...
- Sun Jul 07, 2019 12:40 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Determining a presence of a site (of given type) in game
- Replies: 64
- Views: 25310
Re: Determining a presence of a site (of given type) in game
Not definitively. "playable in region" has never been defined. I agree. Use with Long Dark Reach is a contested topic. If Smaug is playable at The Lonely Mountain, he is arguably still playable in the Northern Rhovanion region. (off topic) On topic... I'm not sure what to do with this pro...