In fact, playing a new character at a new copy of the haven where your wizard is and joining after the movement phase is a way to untap havens.

As per the rule that Konrad states, a lot of the influence hazards do not change GI until the next organisation phase, unless they specifically state that they change GI. Getting a controlling character killed also means moving from DI to GI and also has no effect on the free GI until the next turn,...

Thank you Frodo. Please tell me this is the end to the discussion.

My point was mainly to have Black Rider and TRT as separate cards and we have agreed on that. I think that Marcos last version is ok and up for playtesting.

I agree with Marcos to take original BR from sideboard with BR virtual and do not want to make other changes. Furthermore, I really meant the 6 RW with 6 Black Horse requirement for TRT virtual. It is already easier than the earlier BR virtual and it does not create confusion. Your argument about tu...

For a single RW you can just start with a single Black Horse and move. I fail to see the problem.

2x3 is 6 in your deck at most

Could the link with Unabated in Malice perhaps be dropped? Forcing Balrog rares is nearly as bad as using Balrog rares for virtuals directly. I think some card for the pukel creatures would be nice and perhaps a new Silent Watcher. I do not like linking with Nazgul. Let's see what themes are linked:...

It only forces the character to do nothing and if a strike succeeds, usually a character is wounded or tapped and not going to do anything anyway.

If it is to strong, the discarding can count against the hl, but I did not want to include that immediately for the sake of simplicity.

current version No Way Forward text= Playable on a Pukel-Creature hazard creature attack. If any Pukel-Creature strike succeeds, the defending character may do nothing during the site phase. Alternatively, Unabated in Malice can be played on a Pukel-Creature attack. type = Hazard class = Short-event...

The other Pukel creature card is too strong and too limited at the same time. A 3 card combo is annoying, especially since there are only 2 Pukel Creatures. I think some changes are necessary here. I would prefer one short event and/or one permanent event to make Pukel stronger and perhaps a special...

You are right, Brandobras. One of the reasons that I suggested including sites with pukel-creature auto's is that otherwise it is hardly possible to take prisoners with Pukel-Men, since there are no shadowholds or darkholds in the southwest. If you manage to take anyone prisoner at the Pukel-Deeps, ...

I think this is sufficient to playtest it. Other reactions were that the +3 DI to the whole company is way overpowered, so I am not that pessimistic. Furthermore, you do not need Black Horses, which are a weakness as well. DI with/without Heralded Lord WK 9/3 Akhorahil 9/3 Adunaphel 9/4 Indur 7/5 Ho...

The card: Imprisoned and Mocked text= Playable on a Pukel-Creature attack. One strike of a Pukel-Creature attack attempts to take a hero character prisoner at a shadow-hold [S], dark-hold [D], or the Pukel-deeps. Rescue attacks (2): Pukel-Creature: 3 strikes at 9 prowess, 2 strikes at 10 prowess. ty...

I have a fairly simple question about gccg. Could the trading part be somewhat less obvious in the images? I have done that part when I started with gccg. By now the numbers, prices and such annoy me as excess information I do not want to see when making decks. Also the fact that cards you do not ow...