Search found 200 matches
- Mon Apr 27, 2020 2:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Ready to his will
- Replies: 27
- Views: 10779
Re: Ready to his will
The fact that RtHW is declared in the passive condition's chain-of-effects and thus resolves first makes perfect sense. Thank you! PS. It is actually covered in the CRF: Note that cards like Rank Upon Rank are applied as a passive condition, once an attack of the right type is in play. Therefore you...
- Mon Apr 27, 2020 1:10 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Ready to his will
- Replies: 27
- Views: 10779
Re: Ready to his will
Playable on an Orc, Troll, Giant, Slayer, or Man hazard creature with one strike for each of its attacks. Is that "one strike" the normal number of strikes or the current (i.e. potentially modified) number? Example: Minions Stir is in play. Orc-lieutant has been declared/resolved, and his...
- Thu Apr 16, 2020 6:34 pm
- Forum: CoE Rules & Errata Community Proposals
- Topic: URD Errors - Post Here
- Replies: 93
- Views: 68781
Re: URD Errors - Post Here
Unrevealed on-guard cards are placed in your hand at the end of the Site Phase. It should be: "at the beginning of the End-of-Turn Phase." Do you have a more recent reference for this? MELE at least says "at the end of the site phase." Balrog Summary and CoE #17 agree. It's base...
- Mon Mar 23, 2020 2:12 pm
- Forum: Resolved Reports / Requests
- Topic: Messages in Tapatalk
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10488
Re: Messages in Tapatalk
Resolved. Thanks!
- Tue Mar 10, 2020 1:54 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Untapping/tapping when facing an attack
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1519
Untapping/tapping when facing an attack
Source of confusion: A company may not play any resource during the Site Phase until they have faced all automatic-attacks, unless that resource directly affects an automatic-attack. Removing an automatic-attack does not directly affect it, although cancelling does. When facing an automatic-attack, ...
- Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:11 pm
- Forum: Resolved Reports / Requests
- Topic: Messages in Tapatalk
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10488
Re: Messages in Tapatalk
Looks like tapatalk plugin stopped to work following the latest software update.
- Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:08 pm
- Forum: New Report / Request
- Topic: Hyper Links to Forum Threads Not Working
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8968
Re: Hyper Links to Forum Threads Not Working
Looks like the issue re-appeared following the latest update - links to councilofelrond.org/forum (example) do not work.
- Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:02 pm
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: [M-Adunaphel vs X] deck request
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3598
- Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:31 am
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: [M-Adunaphel vs X] deck request
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3598
Re: [M-Adunaphel vs X] deck request
I haven't seen an Adunaphel deck other than the challenge deck, and I'm wondering whether anybody had put one together and played test it. There are no requirements, really, anything goes (as long as it purposefully makes use of the abilities of the RW).
- Mon Feb 24, 2020 8:29 pm
- Forum: Decks, Strategy, Tips, Ideas
- Topic: [M-Adunaphel vs X] deck request
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3598
[M-Adunaphel vs X] deck request
Anybody willing to share their Adunaphel minion deck?
- Thu Feb 20, 2020 8:34 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: Forum and Website Closure
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3635
Re: Forum and Website Closure
That PM with a "Closure" in the subject almost gave me a heart attack "Downtime" or "Scheduled Maintenance" would be a better choice of words.
Either way, thank you for taking care of this!
Either way, thank you for taking care of this!
- Thu Feb 20, 2020 8:28 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Rescue Prisoners
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3538
Re: Rescue Prisoners
Thanks! Now, this might not be the place for the following question, since Protecting Their Domain is a Dream Card, but would the Rescue Prisoner's spiders receive +2 prowess from PTD? The spiders are not keyed to anything, but is "an attack keyed to a site" synonymous with "an attack...
- Thu Feb 20, 2020 8:05 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Keyed to? Clarified
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5677
Re: Keyed to? Clarified
Cave Worm keyed to Gundabad by the region's name is also keyed by name to a region type of Dark-domain, but is not keyed to a Dark-domain region by type. Its attack is considered a detainment attack against a minion company, but Shadow-cloak cannot be used to cancel a strike from the attack. Makes ...
- Thu Feb 20, 2020 1:04 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Keyed to? Clarified
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5677
Re: Keyed to? Clarified
If a creature was keyed to some region by the region's name, at resolution the creature is also considered keyed to the type of the region. What's the source of your statement? It contravenes the following: Note: A creature played keyed to a specific region by name is not keyed to the specific regi...
- Thu Feb 20, 2020 3:28 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Rescue Prisoners
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3538
Re: Rescue Prisoners
Playable at an already tapped [-me_dh-] or [-me_sh-] during the site phase. The company faces a spider attack (2 strikes with 7 prowess). If no characters are untapped after the attack, discard Rescue Prisoners. Otherwise, you may tap 1 character in the company and put Rescue Prisoners under his co...