Search found 202 matches
- Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:34 pm
- Forum: Solitaire Games
- Topic: *** Hazard Hand variant rules
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6313
*** Hazard Hand variant rules
The following are the Hazard Hand variant rules from The Wizards Companion, already mentioned in another topic : Variant #1: Follow these guidelines when playing hazards: 1) Start the game with 5 hazard cards face down in a row. 2) When a company begins its movement/hazard phase, draw the normal num...
- Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:34 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6521
Re: Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
On the topic of Blasting Fire:
Can the card be discarded (for effect) while the bearer is at a site without an automatic-attack?Discard to cancel all automatic-attacks at a site against the bearer's company, any influence attempts against factions at the site this turn are modified by +2.
- Fri Dec 30, 2016 2:31 am
- Forum: Canadian MECCG Community
- Topic: Players in Ottawa-Gatineau?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10128
Players in Ottawa-Gatineau?
Anybody in Ottawa-Gatineau?
Yes, I've been moving a lot
Yes, I've been moving a lot
- Thu Sep 15, 2016 3:21 am
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: Gavin's Thoughts
- Replies: 14
- Views: 15268
Re: What's this?
UEP stands for Unofficial Errata Proposal. There was an attempt to move its cadaver to this forum, which failed, although the concept was adopted by DC folks who incorporated UEP into DC rules.the Jabberwock wrote:Also, what is UEP?
- Wed Sep 14, 2016 9:04 pm
- Forum: CoE Rules & Errata Community Proposals
- Topic: CoE Erratum Proposal 1
- Replies: 19
- Views: 22300
Re: #CoE Erratum Proposal 1
How about sending a PM to all active (e.g. those with at least 5/10/50 posts) forum members when such a poll is up? Turnout would be better.
- Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:01 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: Gavin's Thoughts
- Replies: 14
- Views: 15268
Re: What's this?
As such, my personal agenda items for the new council [...] You've got my vote :) Just a quick commentary on your proposals: Rules #1: The best place to start would be UEP - have it voted on, make it official. Rules #2: Mr. Took did a great work with his URD. To me, the greatest value of the doc is...
- Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:43 pm
- Forum: CoE Rules & Errata Community Proposals
- Topic: CoE Erratum Proposal 1
- Replies: 19
- Views: 22300
Re: #CoE Erratum Proposal 1
Great to see this (visibly) posted after four years. Any way to make the "issued" thread more visible?
- Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:00 pm
- Forum: The Marketplace
- Topic: Any stores that sell singles?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4500
Re: Any stores that sell singles?
Any luck with bulabula? I tried to contact him (Bob) a couple of months ago but without any response.
- Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:10 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6521
Re: Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
Continuing on a similiar topic, does the following ruling mean an ally, faction, or item that potentially taps the site, or has tapped the site? You may only play a free minor item after playing an ally, faction, or item that taps the site. In the previously-used example of a company at a Shadow-hol...
- Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:30 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6521
Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
Thanks for the answer.
Btw. Is there a single document with all the rulings? I cannot find the quote in the Card Errata and CRF pdf I've got.
Btw. Is there a single document with all the rulings? I cannot find the quote in the Card Errata and CRF pdf I've got.
- Mon Aug 01, 2016 11:33 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6521
Re: Technology items at tapped Dwarf-hold?
Blasting Fire (e.a.) Technology. Playable at a tapped or untapped Shadow-hold, Dark-hold, or a site with a Dwarf automatic-attack When at a Shadow-hold, can I tap a character to play an item, which taps the site, and then tap another character to play Blasting Fire (or Vile Fumes) during the same s...
- Thu Jul 14, 2016 3:33 am
- Forum: Arda
- Topic: Arda Solitaire
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12000
Re: Arda Solitaire
Certainly! My last deck for Arda Solitaire was constructed around a group of trolls burning Rohan and Gondor out from Dol Guldur. And the one before had Orcs of Angmar flavour, so theme-based deck-building is not just doable, but strongly desired.CorumMc wrote:I wonder if you can build a themed deck from this?
- Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:41 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Something Has Slipped
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3355
Re: Something Has Slipped
Text on the card:
CRF:If a character in the company becomes wounded [...]
Is that CRF entry just a clarification on some existing rule (e.g. allies are considered characters for the purpose of combat), or an addition that expands the original usability?Wounding an ally triggers this card.
- Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:05 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Heedless Revelry & the Under-deeps
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1871
Heedless Revelry & the Under-deeps
Heedless Revelry: Playable on a [...] company that is not moving . MEAS booklet: [If the movement roll in unsuccesfull], the company returns to its site of origin (no cards are drawn) and the movement/hazard phase proceeds as if the company had not moved . Is Heedless Revelry playable on a company t...
- Sat May 28, 2016 3:02 pm
- Forum: Arda
- Topic: Arda Solitaire
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12000
Re: Arda Solitaire
Thanks for the tip, Roger. I had not been aware there was a solitaire version of the rules available already. Now, that you mentioned it, I've taken a look at BGG, but I can only find a Spanish translation of them. Alas, I don't speak the language. Do you happen to have the English version or should...