Search found 1393 matches
- Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:38 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: "make Information playable" vs "nothing is considered playable as written on site"
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7291
Re: "make Information playable" vs "nothing is considered playable as written on site"
I have considered this before as well. I have a different opinion. Specifically: So discarding A Panoply of Wings makes Information considered playable as written on site I would say no. Discarding makes information playable at the site (following language of Panoply). I know of no resources that re...
- Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:30 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Daelomin at Home and Marvels Told
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4267
Re: Daelomin at Home and Marvels Told
(Reference CRF Active Conditions, Annotation 6.)
- Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:27 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64576
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
Thematically this translates to situation where a minion faction is not sensitive to presence of other factions in play if influenced by hero character under control of FW player and sensitive if influenced by Orc or Troll character under control of FW player (in the same company). There is no prov...
- Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:18 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Agents and Havens
- Replies: 28
- Views: 17141
Re: Agents and Havens
There should not be a comma.
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 7:10 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Parsimony of Seclusion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 25817
Re: Parsimony of Seclusion
But the player would need to if the wording was changed to "a". Emphasis on "would" in my previous post.
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 7:08 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64576
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
I cannot agree. There would be no objective way to differentiate discrepancies (in which MELE rules take precedence) vs. simply differences.
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 4:42 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64576
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
Is an undead attack keyed to Shadow-lands only detainment if played by a Ringwraith player? No Can a Wizard player play METW Lure of Nature on Orcs? No. (Ignoring CoL already solving Lure of Nature: "The mechanics of any given card will be determined from the most recent English printing (as w...
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 1:11 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64576
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
I'm not sure what you're saying they are forgetting. You are implying that there is something for them to remember. There isn't.
Wrong 'droids.
Wrong 'droids.
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 1:08 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Parsimony of Seclusion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 25817
Re: Parsimony of Seclusion
The fact that it would require that the target is in your discard pile is sufficient to except it from the general rule, in my opinion.
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 12:59 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Agents and Havens
- Replies: 28
- Views: 17141
Re: Agents and Havens
Unless they have a special ability allowing them to, agents may not move to a site, one of its versions is currently in play as a hero Haven or Wizardhaven. If there is no version of the site currently in play, agents may not move to a site that is a hero Haven or Wizard haven in any player's site ...
- Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:31 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Riddling Talk
- Replies: 30
- Views: 19625
Re: Riddling Talk
The verdict is contentious.
Hopefully your play group can read the ideas discussed and come to a mutually acceptable, consistent decision for yourselves.
If this came up at e.g. Worlds... it would probably go to the loudest group present, regardless of thoughtful discussion. Speculating.
Hopefully your play group can read the ideas discussed and come to a mutually acceptable, consistent decision for yourselves.
If this came up at e.g. Worlds... it would probably go to the loudest group present, regardless of thoughtful discussion. Speculating.
- Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:27 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Mount Slain
- Replies: 26
- Views: 7867
Re: Mount Slain
Ah yes. I forgot we were dealing with a Permanent Event here, so an ongoing passive condition it is! All good.
- Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:09 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64576
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
I haven't tried to keep up with everything transpiring word for word. I think the quote I'm adding below is still relevant, but correct me if not and I'll redact. There are simply no rules that a Wizard player can follow that allow them to interpret (for any effect) the meaning of standard modificat...
- Fri Aug 30, 2019 9:44 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Non-minion agents as creatures
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11230
Re: Non-minion agents as creatures
So perhaps my proposal also should include the amendment to MELE: - An agent (Wizard player only for minion agents ) However, this is not needed and the proposal is misleading. For wizard players, agents count as half a creature regardless of whether they are minion agents or non-minion agents. I g...
- Fri Aug 30, 2019 9:39 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Non-minion agents as creatures
- Replies: 15
- Views: 11230
Re: Non-minion agents as creatures
The phase "agents included in deck as a hazards" may be confusing to in that case. Appreciated, but your current framing the first "Note" is similarly confusing in that it is adding to the preceding list without saying that it is adding to the preceding list. The original Note s...