Search found 3031 matches

by Bandobras Took
Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:19 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Still Struggling With Unabated
Replies: 6
Views: 3490

Still Struggling With Unabated

*** Given that Unabated in Malice is played and resolved on the automatic-attack in question when Tidings of Bold Spies resolves, then all effects of Unabated in Malice will be duplicated, per the text of Tidings of Bold Spies, including the cancellation clause of Unabated in Malice. If Unabated in...
by Bandobras Took
Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:15 pm
Forum: Online Tournaments
Topic: II. GCCG Nations Cup 2008 (Talk)
Replies: 157
Views: 97403

Sauron wrote:Team USA

Brian "Sauron" Min (Captain)
Mark "Zara" Alfano
Charles "Stone Troll" Jenkins
Hooray! Competent USA representation (the GCCG tourney was woefully bereft of such. :)).
by Bandobras Took
Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:50 pm
Forum: Online Tournaments
Topic: II. GCCG Nations Cup 2008 (Talk)
Replies: 157
Views: 97403

Sauron wrote:Team Spain looks a bit weighted. World Champ, National Champ, man oh man.
Take a look at the top three names in the GCCG tourney, and you'll find an astonishing resemblance to team Spain. :)
by Bandobras Took
Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:15 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: We have come to kill and hobbits
Replies: 18
Views: 11341

Further question -- given the nature of the two previous rulings, may FWs use Chance Meeting/We Have Come to Kill to bring in characters with more than 5 (or even 6!) mind? We Have Come to Kill allows any character to be played by current rulings, so this should override the 5-mind rule in much the ...
by Bandobras Took
Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:58 pm
Forum: Online Tournaments
Topic: GCCG Championships 2007
Replies: 13
Views: 13168

I do like that the top three were Hero, Fallen, and Minion. Speaks well for an overall balance of play styles.
by Bandobras Took
Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:56 pm
Forum: Online Tournaments
Topic: GCCG Championships 2007
Replies: 13
Views: 13168

I'd have had 3 or 4 tournament points if Manuel hadn't Called Celeborn Home. :)
by Bandobras Took
Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:57 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Indur Unleashed vs Wizardhavens
Replies: 10
Views: 6076

So Great Fissure may be played, but as soon as that cancelling attempt is canceled, then the Wizardhaven goes right back to "If one of your companies is at this site, all attacks against it are canceled." You would need an infinite supply of Great Fissures. Action caused by passive condit...
by Bandobras Took
Thu Oct 18, 2007 6:22 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Indur Unleashed vs Wizardhavens
Replies: 10
Views: 6076

Great Fissure cancels a cancelling attempt. Indur Unleashed make an attack uncancellable. Likewise, Voices of Malice cancels the Way is Shut, but Under-Roads makes Way is Shut unplayable. So Great Fissure may be played, but as soon as that cancelling attempt is canceled, then the Wizardhaven goes ri...
by Bandobras Took
Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:40 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
Replies: 6
Views: 3825

Okay, cool.
by Bandobras Took
Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:43 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
Replies: 6
Views: 3825

Resource is/is not playable at a site regardless on fact whether it may be played there or not. No. Half-Orc are playable at protected wizardhaven. Is there not a contradiction there? If Bree is a protected Wizardhaven for a FW player, then the Half-Orc factions are playable there. Where is the dif...
by Bandobras Took
Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:56 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
Replies: 6
Views: 3825

Trouble On All Borders is not a good comparison because it focuses on regions: Playable on a unique faction in play. Any company moving through the region containing a site where the faction is playable, or through any region adjacent to this one, faces an attack. The attack is the same type as the ...
by Bandobras Took
Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:33 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
Replies: 6
Views: 3825

Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW

Playable on a unique non-Dragon faction. Place a Border-hold from your location deck "off to the side" with this card. The Border-hold must be in the same region or adjacent thereto as a site where the target faction is playable. Return any faction playable at the Border-hold to its owner...
by Bandobras Took
Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:24 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: One Ring Strike Canceling?
Replies: 2
Views: 2488

One Ring Strike Canceling?

The One Ring wrote:Bearer may make a corruption check modified by -2 to cancel a non-Undead, non-Nazgul strike.
This does not specify a strike against the bearer. May I cancel ANY strike using this ability?
by Bandobras Took
Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:44 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: No multiple agents' attacks?
Replies: 6
Views: 4755

Actually, nothing says that the declaration resolves instantly (unlike on-guards, which declare and resolve immediately). Since by definition the company has to have entered the site and faced the auto-attack for the agent to declare their attack, any actions may be declared in response to the decla...
by Bandobras Took
Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:18 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: No multiple agents' attacks?
Replies: 6
Views: 4755

4) If there are multiple auto attacks at a site, may the agent attack immediately after any of them, or only the last?

Go to advanced search