Search found 3031 matches
- Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Still Struggling With Unabated
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3490
Still Struggling With Unabated
*** Given that Unabated in Malice is played and resolved on the automatic-attack in question when Tidings of Bold Spies resolves, then all effects of Unabated in Malice will be duplicated, per the text of Tidings of Bold Spies, including the cancellation clause of Unabated in Malice. If Unabated in...
- Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:15 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: II. GCCG Nations Cup 2008 (Talk)
- Replies: 157
- Views: 97403
- Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:50 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: II. GCCG Nations Cup 2008 (Talk)
- Replies: 157
- Views: 97403
- Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:15 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: We have come to kill and hobbits
- Replies: 18
- Views: 11341
Further question -- given the nature of the two previous rulings, may FWs use Chance Meeting/We Have Come to Kill to bring in characters with more than 5 (or even 6!) mind? We Have Come to Kill allows any character to be played by current rulings, so this should override the 5-mind rule in much the ...
- Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:58 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: GCCG Championships 2007
- Replies: 13
- Views: 13168
- Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:56 pm
- Forum: Online Tournaments
- Topic: GCCG Championships 2007
- Replies: 13
- Views: 13168
- Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:57 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Indur Unleashed vs Wizardhavens
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6076
- Thu Oct 18, 2007 6:22 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Indur Unleashed vs Wizardhavens
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6076
Great Fissure cancels a cancelling attempt. Indur Unleashed make an attack uncancellable. Likewise, Voices of Malice cancels the Way is Shut, but Under-Roads makes Way is Shut unplayable. So Great Fissure may be played, but as soon as that cancelling attempt is canceled, then the Wizardhaven goes ri...
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:40 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3825
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:43 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3825
Resource is/is not playable at a site regardless on fact whether it may be played there or not. No. Half-Orc are playable at protected wizardhaven. Is there not a contradiction there? If Bree is a protected Wizardhaven for a FW player, then the Half-Orc factions are playable there. Where is the dif...
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:56 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3825
Trouble On All Borders is not a good comparison because it focuses on regions: Playable on a unique faction in play. Any company moving through the region containing a site where the faction is playable, or through any region adjacent to this one, faces an attack. The attack is the same type as the ...
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:33 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3825
Long Grievous Siege vs. Hero/FW
Playable on a unique non-Dragon faction. Place a Border-hold from your location deck "off to the side" with this card. The Border-hold must be in the same region or adjacent thereto as a site where the target faction is playable. Return any faction playable at the Border-hold to its owner...
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:24 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: One Ring Strike Canceling?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2488
One Ring Strike Canceling?
This does not specify a strike against the bearer. May I cancel ANY strike using this ability?The One Ring wrote:Bearer may make a corruption check modified by -2 to cancel a non-Undead, non-Nazgul strike.
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:44 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: No multiple agents' attacks?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4755
Actually, nothing says that the declaration resolves instantly (unlike on-guards, which declare and resolve immediately). Since by definition the company has to have entered the site and faced the auto-attack for the agent to declare their attack, any actions may be declared in response to the decla...
- Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:18 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: No multiple agents' attacks?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4755