I do not see Annotation 15 and Annotation 10 being in conflict. It seems to me that Annotation 10 spells out the exception to Annotation 11 Annotation 15.
i.e. This is not allowed to happen, but if it does happen, this is what you do about it...
Search found 1131 matches
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 2:26 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Attack as a first declared action in chain of effects
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7235
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 2:20 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Reversion of Site Types
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9999
Re: Reversion of Site Types
Okay thank you. You are right, it is possible to “remove a card from play” that is not currently on the playing surface, so I like your addition of the “active” qualifier.
I have amended my OP proposal to include this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have amended my OP proposal to include this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:01 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Effects of a using a Palantír (clarification)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5495
Re: Effects of a using a Palantír (clarification)
As for your point at hand, I believe what you desire is the point of a Rules Summary . But the rules themselves should be mechanically consistent. Note that historically, for example, specific errata was issued for all four of the cards that removed the region in which a Guarded Haven is located fr...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 1:56 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Fallen Wizard MPs for Palantirs
- Replies: 29
- Views: 16846
Re: Fallen Wizard MPs for Palantirs
just saying we need not have to have 2 different rules set, when we already came up with good solution Keep in mind that there are some DC rules and/or card errata that some players do not like and would not want to see become part of the standard game rules. Also, DC rules/errata are created by th...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 1:46 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Effects of a using a Palantír (clarification)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5495
Re: Effects of a using a Palantír (clarification)
It may be summary of the errata but not the errata itself. Players should know the mechanics, not only conclusion that "only one corruption check is required/performed" (that alone would be a dogma). It would not be an erratum at all, it would be a simple clarification to clarify that onl...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 1:32 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Reversion of Site Types
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9999
Re: Reversion of Site Types
Or: "The play of certain cards can change the type of sites that your companies may use (e.g. Plotting Ruin, Heart Grown Cold, etc.). When this happens, immediately exchange any affected site cards already in play with the corresponding site cards of the proper type. If such a card is subseque...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 1:29 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Duration of Short Events
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3756
Re: WITHDRAWN - Duration of Short Events
DECLINED due to author withdrawing submission.
(Note: I am locking this topic at this time for record-keeping purposes)
(Note: I am locking this topic at this time for record-keeping purposes)
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 1:27 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Duration of Short Events
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3756
Re: WITHDRAWN - Duration of Short Events
Thanks for the input guys! I am withdrawing this submission.
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:41 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Bring Our Curses Home + Ahunts
- Replies: 24
- Views: 12853
Re: Bring Our Curses Home + Ahunts
Okay, so you are looking to overturn the previous NetRep rulings then. Thanks for clarifying.
So a hypothetical vote then would be essentially:
Should BOCH be allowed to be played on an Ahunt Dragon manifestation:
- Yes
- No
(You are in favor of it not being playable at all with Ahunts)
So a hypothetical vote then would be essentially:
Should BOCH be allowed to be played on an Ahunt Dragon manifestation:
- Yes
- No
(You are in favor of it not being playable at all with Ahunts)
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:34 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN: Aware of Their Ways (clarification)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5567
Re: Aware of Their Ways (clarification)
Once a company's M/H phase is over, the site of origin is discarded (or returned to location deck). At this point, it is too late for a later-played Aware of Their Ways to return that company to its site of origin. Illegal company composition (end of all company M/H phases). Will you please provide...
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:19 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: People Diminished
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4144
Re: People Diminished
What about Lord and Usurper ? Doesn't it suffer from the same problems? Interesting that the wording ICE chose for Invade Their Domain avoids all such problems. RE: People Diminished / Tempest of Fire .... when would you not have a company present during the site phase if the associated site was in ...
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:02 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: MPs for Trophies
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13299
Re: MPs for Trophies
I believe the intent of the CRF entry is to establish that trophies should not take away from your normal marshalling point accumulations (unless the character loses the trophy or is themselves is lost and taking the trophy with them). I agree. Although I seem to recall there is also a provision th...
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:32 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: MPs for Trophies
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13299
Re: MPs for Trophies
I'm unclear on what the problem is. Is the issue that a trophy taken for a Fallen-wizard player's orc/troll should only be worth 1 MP instead of full kill points as listed on the card? If so, I don't think the CRF quoted over-rides the MP rules for Fallen-wizards as outlined in the White Hand rulebo...
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:16 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Skill cards target character with skill
- Replies: 63
- Views: 30075
Re: Skill cards target character with skill
Quite the discussion guys! :shock: Personally, I feel that ARV errata should focus primarily on making the game more enjoyable and approachable, while less confusing and frustrating for most players. I feel a large majority of players would be turned off by the idea that you can use an opponent's ch...
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:08 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Desire All for Thy Belly (clarification)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3727
Re: Desire All for Thy Belly (clarification)
Okay, I just read your other topic (Aware of Their Ways) and see your intent.... Player A exhausts his play deck and reshuffles, after which Player B plays Desire All for Thy Belly and chooses same site of origin (Wondrous Maps, etc.), after which Player A must return same company to site of origin....