On Tuesday, April 25, 2017, user the Jabberwock wrote: Update to All: The current plan is to update to the new webpage on Friday, May 5th. When this happens, the new web page will be live, but the forums will be out of service. The goal is to get the new forums done over the weekend and have them ba...

On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, user the Jabberwock wrote: To all registered users and guests: I wanted to give everyone a heads up that we are in the final stages of preparing the new CoE website and forum. In the near future, the new home page will be published and at that time the forum will be ina...

On Tuesday, April 25, 2017, user Konrad Klar wrote:

Konrad Klar wrote:Treatment of headache by cutting a head...

This post has been re-created due to lost data and was originally posted by the author quoted above.

On Tuesday, April 25, 2017, user Logain wrote: I did not notice that a realism was concern of anyone participating in this discussion. Just saying it in case. If I understand a concern was: at which moment a site already in play must be specified as a new site of company that declares movement to a/...

On Saturday, April 22, 2017, user dirhaval wrote: This has been a good argument to read. I have played with the idea to move to a site on the table, but not tell the opponent until the company moved to the site; Some of my opponents have done it, so I followed. I will no longer do that. Sometimes it...

On Friday, April 21, 2017, user Bandobras Took wrote: I did not notice that a realism was concern of anyone participating in this discussion. Indeed, I'm not sure it applies to *any* rules discussion. :) This post has been re-created due to lost data and was originally posted by the author quoted ab...

On Friday, April 21, 2017, user Konrad Klar wrote: I did not notice that a realism was concern of anyone participating in this discussion. If I understand a concern was: at which moment a site already in play must be specified as a new site of company that declares movement to a/the site already in ...

On Friday, April 21, 2017, user Logain wrote: To my opinion RAI > Consistency > Fairness > RAW (RAI - rules as intended <> RAW - rules as written) Maybe sometimes LoRE beta rules (that never were published) can be read to see the RAI. That second version that ICE prepared mentions that you choose if...

On Friday, April 7, 2017, user Thorsten the Traveller wrote: I already mentioned the situation of playing whatever card you want as an agent. People who cheat are going to find a way to cheat. I suppose so. In this case though, the 'agent' can be revealed with Here Is a Snake, which means auto-disqu...

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017, user Bandobras Took wrote: I want to be fair: if I understand, Bandobras does not say about "delayed" choice. Rather about non-disclosed choosing, and stating later which of sites has been chosen (albeit without any technical chance for detecting a change of de...

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017, user Konrad Klar wrote: I want to be fair: if I understand, Bandobras does not say about "delayed" choice. Rather about non-disclosed choosing, and stating later which of sites has been chosen (albeit without any technical chance for detecting a change of decis...

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017, user Mordakai wrote: And from my limited point of view... does anyone thought that the REAL intention of the game developers was exactly that? That you can "delay" the choice of site to move at until you have no other choice than moving that company, and depend...

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017, user Konrad Klar wrote: I'm saying two things. 1. Fairness is not good criterion for the game. Consistency is better. Without consistency there is place for things that work despite of some reason and for other things that do not work for the same reason. 2. If someone a...

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017, user Bandobras Took wrote: Just my 2 cents, I never played it like one merely says "move to site on table", but indicating which site card specifically. simple reason: I think it's unfair if one changes a company's movement should an Ahunt Dragon all of a sudde...

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017, user Thorsten the Traveller wrote: That's nice, but the site path cannot be determined nor indicated until the company's m/h phase, whereas determining the site card itself can. Are you saying that not solving 1 wrong is a valid reason to not solve another? Or just that ...