the cleanest way Thanks. So in summary for Eric watching, you would not have time to untap a character in a My Precious --> Gollum scenario. :wink: Yes. Rest is mechanics working behind the scenes. :) I think we should still let people respond normally to the stuff declared, risk of any kind of abu...

Company returned to its site of origin did not move (at least in its last M/H phase) to its site of origin but this company did move in general. Because (in contrast to companies that successfully moved) returned company is at site I do not see a reason of retaining its status site of origin/new sit...

Then Doors of Night are considered as being in play.

Card Gates of Morning will not be affected.
Discarding of resource environment cards (and canceling its effects) is result of resolving the card Doors of Night.
Mere presence of Doors of Night in play does not discard resource environment cards (and does not cancel effects).

In current form Annotation 15 is like: "X cannot be done -> Y cannot be done" where Y is subcategory of X. "Someone cannot play characters -> he cannot play Hobbits" is valid implication. But not only implication. It does not mean that someone can play Men, or Elves. P.S. Things ...

It may make sense to add: "No other action may be declared in response, unless the action targets dice-rolling action declared earlier in the chain of effects" to prevent abuse (last use of untapped characters after attack of Wild Fell Beasts, or Knights of Prince), although risk of abuse ...

Proposed rulings: All mandatory actions resulting from a conluded attack are declared as first actions of chain of effects that immediately follow the chain of effects containing the attack in order choosen by player proceding its turn. All non-mandatory actions resulting from a conluded attack may ...

Are there cards that refer to a "non-moving company" or do they just refer to companies not moving? If it's the latter, then having the whole line about a non-moving company might not be necessary. "The company is not considered a moving company for any other purposes until that comp...

So Annotation 10 works for all the actions that are required to be the first action. All attacks from ahunts are required to be the first action per Anno 15. Applying Annotation 10 to them would seem to make sense. If one wants to see it that way. ;) Now wait for someone wondering whether action fr...

[...]I think for timing purposes you'd need to declare this effect as a part of the attack (declared when the attack itself is declared). Something like "After attack, each character wounded by Ghosts makes a corruption check modified by -1"? Which should be effective even if Ghosts are n...

Declaration is just declaration, whether made by player or by game. We would debate whether that made by game may be called "in response", or only that made by players. But Annotation 15 says "An attack must be the first declared action in a chain of effects" and further says abo...

Thanks for explanation. I just was not sure of meaning a word "seized". :oops: Unless there is some situation where it would become problematic, I suggest that site remains the company's "new site" until the site phase. Probably is not problematic. IF goal is an establishment tha...

Not sure whether I get this logic.

What if Orc Brawler is under second effect of Subtlety of Guile (-2 to body), and under Ahorahil's effect (-1 to body)?
What if Orc Brawler additionally bears Black Mail Coat?

(ii) A company that has declared movement during org phase, becomes a moving company at the beginning of its own move/haz phase. Here "a moving company", "a company moving", "a company en route" etc. are all synonyms. Once that company ends its own move/haz phase, it s...

Start of M/H phase, Snowstorm, at least one in company's path.