That's exactly how I have been playing, but I'm just unable to find the specific rule for the timingKonrad Klar wrote: ↑Thu Jul 19, 2018 7:03 aman on-guard creature card must be revealed before an automatic-attacks are faced
Search found 200 matches
- Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:08 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Morgul-Rats On Guard
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7203
Re: Morgul-Rats On Guard
- Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:28 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Morgul-Rats On Guard
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7203
Re: Morgul-Rats On Guard
If said Morgul-rats was placed on-guard when DoN is in play, what exactly is the timing when the Rats could be revealed (assuming DoN is still in play)? I'm aware that AA would need to be faced first, followed by potential agent attacks, so could the card be revealed right after the auto- and agent-...
- Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:39 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: Forum Out of Service
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11141
- Thu Jun 28, 2018 2:50 am
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote
- Topic: 2018 ARV - Results
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9451
Re: 2018 ARV - Results
The data you request is available to everyone now if you simply click on the polling topic you are interested in. At the top it shows total votes broken down by result. My request was based on tapatalk-browsing through the ballots, and said data is not visible in the app. My apologies, I should hav...
- Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:02 pm
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote
- Topic: 2018 ARV - Results
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9451
Re: 2018 ARV - Results
I dare to say that viewing the results in full (i.e. how many persons voted on each of the topics, and how many votes there were for the winning option) would be an interesting lecture. Any plans to publish that?
- Fri Jun 15, 2018 12:59 am
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: The One Ring
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7574
Re: The One Ring
It'd make sense not to bring this item up for voting the next year, if the ballot wasn't resolving one issue by creating another one. In this case, however, if the ballot is downvoted, you'd be unable to tell whether it is due to the populace's unwillingness to accept the change or, rather, to their...
- Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:58 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Great Ship
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9616
Re: Great Ship
Can it at least cancel the effects of a permanent-event or an (non-automatic) attack?
- Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:56 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Great Ship
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9616
Re: Great Ship
How about using Great Ship to cancel the effects of Adunaphel's short-event?
Adunaphel wrote:[...] When tapped, Adûnaphel becomes a short‐event and causes any one character to tap.
- Fri Jun 08, 2018 9:08 pm
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: The One Ring
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7574
Re: The One Ring
I guess the ballot is for the Hero version only because the submitter of this thread overlooked the fact that the Minion version has different wording of the sentence... Now, one might wonder which situation is worse: having two differently-working (whilst being the same item) The One Rings (vote: Y...
- Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:30 am
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote
- Topic: 2018 ARV - Voting Instructions & Master Index - BEGIN HERE
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5750
Re: 2018 ARV - Voting Instructions & Master Index - BEGIN HERE
If anybody was looking for the three SQs, they're: #12 (Deep Mines), #24 (Cave-drake) and #35a (Neither so Ancient Nor so Potent).the Jabberwock wrote: ↑Sat May 05, 2018 3:37 amThree ballot items are listed as “Status Quo” ballot items.
- Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:24 am
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Freeze the flesh
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8674
Re: Freeze the flesh
Don't despair Theo - there will be ARV in '19, and yours could be the first submission
- Fri May 11, 2018 6:43 pm
- Forum: Council Business
- Topic: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Register Here to Vote!
- Replies: 102
- Views: 82326
- Sat May 05, 2018 1:19 am
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Erratum Proposal : Neither so Ancient Nor so Potent
- Replies: 36
- Views: 24739
Re: Erratum Proposal : Neither so Ancient Nor so Potent
That makes perfect sense ... I better stop making a fool of myself and start thinking before postingBandobras Took wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 4:46 pmThinking about it purely from the thematic perspective, the card is meant to represent that an item isn't as good as the one it was modeled on.
- Sat May 05, 2018 1:14 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: We Have Come to Kill: target?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 18092
Re: We Have Come to Kill: target?
During site phase, may WHCtK/ACM be played just after AA and before playing a normally-playable item at a site?
- Fri May 04, 2018 1:21 pm
- Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Erratum Proposal : Neither so Ancient Nor so Potent
- Replies: 36
- Views: 24739
Erratum Proposal : Neither so Ancient Nor so Potent
I'd say that Neither so Ancient Nor so Potent giving non-Item MPs is the whole point of the card... Nothing's sweeter than doubling your own Item MPs by discarding your opponents last (and stored) item.