Search found 4345 matches
- Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:38 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Armory Hoard Bypass
- Replies: 35
- Views: 1188
Re: Armory Hoard Bypass
Major Items are not Special Items. There absolutely *is* a correct site for playing major items. I did not say about "major items" in general, nor about "items" in general. I did say about items that are not played at a site. Item played in result of discarding of Necklace of Gi...
- Sat Feb 17, 2024 6:37 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Armory Hoard Bypass
- Replies: 35
- Views: 1188
Re: Armory Hoard Bypass
(Now that I think about it, Necklace allows the play of major items even if not at the correct site to play major items. There is no "correct site to play major items" if the items are not played at a site. Likewise there is no "correct site" for playing of a ring special item. ...
- Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:28 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Armory Hoard Bypass
- Replies: 35
- Views: 1188
Re: Armory Hoard Bypass
@dirhaval If unique card would be under Armory it would be strange if its other copy would be in play. I do not know, why I did not think about this before, but: I know why I did not think about this before. :? Even if a character is not able to bear some item, it does not mean that he may not make ...
- Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:20 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: The Witch-king
- Replies: 3
- Views: 109
Re: The Witch-king
1. In addition.
2. Yes.
2. Yes.
- Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:04 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Armory Hoard Bypass
- Replies: 35
- Views: 1188
Re: Armory Hoard Bypass
I do not know, why I did not think about this before, but: if a character bears Elven Cloak and tries to play minor item at [-me_ha-] , or at [-me_fh-], or at [-me_bh-], can he play Elven Cloak from under Armory? If "When you otherwise would be allowed to play a minor item from your hand at a B...
- Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:18 am
- Forum: Odds, Ends & Hobbit Holes
- Topic: Randomization problems in sealed product?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3015
Re: Randomization problems in sealed product?
"Randomized" does not mean "evenly distributed".
For some friendly group of players in Poland in 90' actually rare card was Marvels Told and most common was hero Dunharrow.
Personally I am under impression that there are rare Uncommons - Bridge, The Old Thrush, Ancient Stair.
For some friendly group of players in Poland in 90' actually rare card was Marvels Told and most common was hero Dunharrow.
Personally I am under impression that there are rare Uncommons - Bridge, The Old Thrush, Ancient Stair.
- Wed Jan 31, 2024 4:25 am
- Forum: CoE Rules & Errata Community Proposals
- Topic: Tidings of Bold Spies (clarification)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2726
Re: Tidings of Bold Spies (clarification)
If you want to continue a discussion from archived thread, then open a new topic in appropriate section of forum and quote the text of your interest or make link to the archived thread.
- Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:18 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2361
Re: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
I agree with example of Miruvor. Affected object should be so described that it would have a chance to be valid both at declaration and at resolution. E.g. "company of bearer/former bearer of X". For Sacrifice of Form: if someone maintains that discarding of Wizard is condition, not main e...
- Tue Jan 16, 2024 2:52 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2361
Re: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
Annotation 6: If an action requires an entity to be discarded as a condition for the action's main effect, that entity must be discarded when the action is declared; this is considered synonymous with the action's declaration, i.e., it is not a separate action. In which cases it is self-defeating (...
- Tue Jan 16, 2024 7:26 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2361
Re: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
Traitor METW-UE.png I was looking on text of Traitor from METW UE. The last paragraph would not make a sense if the action from Traitor would not be replacement of normal effect of failed cc. And I suspect that effect of Traitor as replacement of normal effect of cc was original intention and addin...
- Sun Jan 14, 2024 9:01 am
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2361
Re: Traitor and the Ring's Betrayal
I have decided to revisit this thread, because I think that something important was overlooked by me (and probably not only by me). Effect of Traitor is not triggered as triggered is an action caused by passive condition. Rather it is effect that replaces normal effect of failed cc. Similarly effect...
- Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:34 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
- Topic: Spying out the Land - infinitely effective
- Replies: 1
- Views: 487
Spying out the Land - infinitely effective
The Lidless Eye: Spying out the Land Rarity: Rare, Precise: R Resource: Short-event Magic. Spirit-magic. Playable on a spirit-magic-using character during the organization phase. Opponent may reveal to you any hazards from his hand, and only those hazards can be played during the character company'...
- Tue Dec 19, 2023 6:32 am
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of CoE Digest #203 Q2 - Facing a Traitor attack during your opponent's turn - Open until January 22
- Replies: 2
- Views: 457
Re: Draft of CoE Digest #203 Q2 - Facing a Traitor attack during your opponent's turn - Open until January 22
Character facing a strike does not tap for full prowess. Moreover, if tapped while facing a strike, character suffers -1 penalty to prowess. (Player controlling of) untapped character may decide to take -3 penalty to prowess and not be automatically tapped after facing a strike that is not successfu...
- Tue Dec 19, 2023 6:21 am
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of Coe Digest #203 Q5 - Tom, Leaflock, Great Ship - Open until January 22
- Replies: 3
- Views: 615
Re: Draft of Coe Digest #203 Q5 - Tom, Leaflock, Great Ship - Open until January 22
1. Some short-events that target a company or an entity associated with company (e.g. 1st use of Gloom or 1st use of Weariness of the Heart, Lost at Sea, Lost in Free-domains) have lasting effects. The effects may be canceled when such short-event is already resolved. So tapping action of Leaflock, ...
- Mon Dec 18, 2023 10:11 pm
- Forum: Drafts
- Topic: Draft of CoE Digest #203 Q7 - Carambor + Spying out the lands - Open until January 22
- Replies: 6
- Views: 849
Re: Draft of CoE Digest #203 Q7 - Carambor + Spying out the lands - Open until January 22
Opponent may reveal to you any hazards from his hand, and only those hazards can be played during the character company's movement/hazard phase. is immediate action. Postponing it to the beginning of character's M/H phase is act of creation. Spying out the Land does not specify any conditions under...