Search found 2811 matches

by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 5:45 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: CoE Rulings Digest #121 Debate
Replies: 13
Views: 252

Re: [NetRep] CoE Rulings Digest #121

I like your logic on the wounding from the rules texts. However, how do you account for: The rules on detainment attacks change the result of a successful strike (against the character), not the result a failed a strike (by the attacker). The detainment rules only change the result of defeating all...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 5:08 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: CoE Rulings Digest #121 Debate
Replies: 13
Views: 252

Re: [NetRep] CoE Rulings Digest #121

Theo wrote: Thu Aug 20, 2020 4:53 pm Furthermore, miguel's wording doesn't address whether or not an agent can be wounded.
It does.
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 5:04 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: CoE Rulings Digest #121 Debate
Replies: 13
Views: 252

Re: [NetRep] CoE Rulings Digest #121

I like your logic on the wounding from the rules texts. However, how do you account for: >Well I guess we won't have to worry about giving away three kill MP's with Golodhros anymore..., but..., can he become wounded? Probably not. No. Agents attacking as detainment cannot be wounded. The rules on ...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 4:49 pm
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Removed from the Game & Removed from Play
Replies: 15
Views: 10304

Re: Removed from the Game & Removed from Play

Aware of their Ways (and Knowledge of the Enemy) specifically state otherwise Except these cards do not specifically state that the card isn't just discarded (again). We know it is possible to discard cards already in the discard because of the remaining text on Aware of Their Ways. If someone hall...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 4:11 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: CoE Rulings Digest #121 Debate
Replies: 13
Views: 252

Re: [NetRep] CoE Rulings Digest #121

Do the guidelines for wounding/eliminating agents apply to detainment attacks from agents? Will Gothmog get tired of Golodhros pestering him and simply rip him a new one? --------------------------------------------------- Detainment attacks can't be defeated, so all Gothmog can really do is tell G...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 1:12 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: CoE Rulings Digest #121 Debate
Replies: 13
Views: 252

Re: [NetRep] CoE Rulings Digest #121

5) Do the sites that have become adjacent to an under-deeps site due to Caverns Unchoked count as surface sites. --------------------------------------------------- The answer is yes, so you cannot play cards like A Few Recruits at those sites anymore. While this might "make sense" becaus...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 1:11 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: CoE Rulings Digest #121 Debate
Replies: 13
Views: 252

CoE Rulings Digest #121 Debate

3) Do the guidelines for wounding/eliminating agents apply to detainment attacks from agents? Will Gothmog get tired of Golodhros pestering him and simply rip him a new one? --------------------------------------------------- Detainment attacks can't be defeated, so all Gothmog can really do is tel...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 1:07 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules
Replies: 298
Views: 81744

Re: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules

3) Do the guidelines for wounding/eliminating agents apply to detainment attacks from agents? Will Gothmog get tired of Golodhros pestering him and simply rip him a new one? --------------------------------------------------- Detainment attacks can't be defeated, so all Gothmog can really do is tel...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 12:47 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules
Replies: 298
Views: 81744

Re: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules

4) Scenario: I declare hazard play and the hazard limit is checked. My opponent cancels the hazard before it resolves. Question: Is the hazard limit reduced or not? I know the hazard limit is checked on declaration and resolution, but when is the hazard limit actually reduced by the play of a hazar...
by CDavis7M
Thu Aug 20, 2020 12:38 am
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules
Replies: 298
Views: 81744

Re: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules

5) Do the sites that have become adjacent to an under-deeps site due to Caverns Unchoked count as surface sites. --------------------------------------------------- The answer is yes, so you cannot play cards like A Few Recruits at those sites anymore. While this might "make sense" becaus...
by CDavis7M
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:34 pm
Forum: Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)
Topic: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules
Replies: 298
Views: 81744

Re: Incorrect and non-ratified CoE rulings that contradict the existing ICE rulings and the Rules

NetRep] CoE Rulings Digest #123 1 a) Can I play play Sacrifice of Form with Crown of Flowers and then later Twilight CoF and play a second SoF? --------------------------------------------------- Yes, if all requirements for such are met, it is legal. This is incorrect. Sacrifice of Form specifical...
by CDavis7M
Wed Aug 19, 2020 4:00 am
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Removed from the Game & Removed from Play
Replies: 15
Views: 10304

Re: Removed from the Game & Removed from Play

From this understanding, all of the other cards and rules are consistent and make sense. You are missing that there are multiple senses of the term "play" used in the rules. The rules are ambiguous. That can mean that there are multiple valid (consistent) interpretations of them; that doe...
by CDavis7M
Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:42 am
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Spies Feared
Replies: 10
Views: 5666

Re: Spies Feared

Konrad Klar wrote: Sun Apr 08, 2018 11:55 pm I propose the following erratum:
Why? A card cannot fail by itself.

It says right there on the card: "against minion companies" -- which is your opponent's company.
by CDavis7M
Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:38 am
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Multi-player Games
Replies: 7
Views: 7767

Re: Multi-player Games

Only the moving player, and the hazard player drawing cards based on his movement, may take advantage of drawing cards, including cards drawn for events like The Nazgul are Abroad and From the Pits of Angband. These two players are also the only ones who may discard a card at the end of the turn. A...
by CDavis7M
Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:37 am
Forum: 2018 Annual Rules Vote
Topic: BALLOT ITEM # 42: Multi-player Games {rules erratum}
Replies: 1
Views: 5446

Re: BALLOT ITEM # 42: Multi-player Games {rules erratum}

In these rules, two mistakes are made. 1. No such thing as a moving player exists. The active resource player might have several companies, each of which having their moving/hazard phase(s). The expression "moving player" is also used by the Designers, not the Netrep. In fact, this CRF en...

Go to advanced search