Search found 1393 matches
- Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:59 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)
- Replies: 50
- Views: 31184
Re: Creatures played as an automatic-attack (playabilty conditions)
Throwing out anything with a condition seems like too big of a shift. If any change is necessary (maybe folks with more competition experience could weigh in?), I think the natural re-interpretation should be that the keyability conditions must be satisfied as they would normally to actually be able...
- Sun Jan 06, 2019 5:35 pm
- Forum: Resolved Reports / Requests
- Topic: Request: enable strikethrough text
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6971
Re: Request: enable strikethrough text
Hah, awesome. Hopefully won't find too many uses for it. Thanks!
- Wed Jan 02, 2019 11:56 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
@ Theo: If I influence my opponent's faction, can I search through my play deck/discard pile/sideboard to find my copy of that card for Sentinels of Numenor? Since the only requirement is to influence a faction, and I clearly can't place my opponent's faction under the card, and there is no mention...
- Tue Jan 01, 2019 5:15 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
"Place any such faction" wording on Sentinels of Numenor does not specify that it must be the faction card that was influenced. Influencing any version of the faction would count as the faction having been influenced, so as long as Sentinels of Numenor was in play when opponent's faction ...
- Tue Jan 01, 2019 12:53 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
Faction cards are not influence check modifier cards. A revealed faction is neither played nor are its Standard Modifications an ability, so they could not fit into the "other modifications" bullet. (underline mine) Standard Modifications on a faction card apply when influencing that card...
- Sun Dec 30, 2018 6:44 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
BRINGING A FACTION INTO PLAY In order to play a faction card, you must tap one of your characters that is at the "site" indicated on the faction's card. Then you must make an influence check. Make a roll (2D6), add your character's unused direct influence, and add any appropriate modifica...
- Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:12 am
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
Indeed, the Influencing an Opponent's Faction rules have roll modifications only based on the card you are trying to influence. A revealed faction only sets the "value to bring the faction into play" goal to zero.
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:50 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
Oh shoot. A Few Recruits breaks the consistency: It does not break. The modifications are not Standard Modifications. I would think "affect an influence check the same way" would include requirements for whether they are applied. But then, of course, Dragon modifications wouldn't fall und...
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:24 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
Oh shoot. A Few Recruits breaks the consistency (regardless of whether the Balrog Summary refers to player influencing or faction being influenced): Modifications: The Balrog (+3), leader (+2). Surely the modifications seem intended to be used. I blame their rush to print? But I would have no proble...
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:15 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
As RW player, I go to Wellinghall to influence my opponent's Ents of Fangorn faction. My opponent has the Hobbits faction in play. Do I, as a RW player, get a +4 standard modification to the influence attempt as listed on the faction card? At the moment this seems true, if not intended. Hobbits fac...
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:03 pm
- Forum: Official Rulings
- Topic: SPOILER Errors - Post Here
- Replies: 54
- Views: 38306
Re: SPOILER Errors - Post Here
Updating my first post to make it easier to search; moderators feel free to delete the extra posts. Adding: Gold Belt of Lorien: should be CP: 1, not MP: 1 The Ithil-stone: clearly wrong Mumak (Oliphant): does not list number of strikes Arthadan Rangers: "containinona" Sacrifice of Form: &...
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:19 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
I think that Balrog summary (not only in the fragment) is incomplete and inaccurate. Whether to interpret "(heroes)", "(minions)" as alignment of players (lack of coverage of FW player), or whether to interpret it as race of influencer (lack of coverage of Radagast's Black Bird)...
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 8:13 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
Beasts of the Wood and Wild Hounds modifications are self-contained; they explicitly state the requirement that must be met for the bonus. "Men (+1)" is different from "If the influencing character is a Man (+1)". The second of these, also self contained, I would have no problem ...
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 6:15 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: WITHDRAWN - Standard Modifications (overhaul)
- Replies: 128
- Views: 64586
Re: Standard Modifications (overhaul)
As RW player, I go to Wellinghall to influence my opponent's Ents of Fangorn faction. My opponent has the Hobbits faction in play. Do I, as a RW player, get a +4 standard modification to the influence attempt as listed on the faction card? If influencing character is hobbit, then yes. On what basis...
- Mon Dec 24, 2018 9:43 pm
- Forum: 2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
- Topic: Determining a presence of a site (of given type) in game
- Replies: 64
- Views: 25077
Re: Determining a presence of a site (of given type) in game
If Doors of Night is not in play, it is definitively not the case that Smaug is playable at a region other than a Coastal Sea, as required by Long Dark Reach.