By the way.... Is there a reason why it should be uniqu anyway??? YEAh i don't see where the point is of forbidding the site... also from a flavour perspective.... why shouldn't saruman wellcome his fellow wizards in isengard like torsten said? maybe we could make some kind of clause that Isengard b...

Why do you want to forbid other Fallen wizards to move to isengard in the first place???
why shouldn't they be allowed to move there?

nice.... never playtested them... but still love the idear behind both of those cards!
they shoudl definitly be in V-2

maybe just discard the mode card... but not the followers... whenever at haven???

I was not refering... that those cards were needed.... I don't know enough about moving RW to have a proper opinion... I was just refering to making new cards in general! (by the way... Magic has the no banning policy... although it is not allways possible because of misstakes they have made in the ...

although a lot of cards might be different.... still their old versions would not have been played at all.... (maybe excluding bard the bowman e.g.) I believe you guys have to accept that some cards might render obsolete when we design V-cards... THIS is just a normal design process...that some card...

like the new version for THEY RIDE together...very much!
easy! and has nearly the same effekt in game!!!
(and it finaly makes sense for the card to untap and tap again.
To gain more MP)

Maybe the only thing to add would be to choose if to untap or not...!
(but that would be something to test)

yeah maybe we should limit that to organistion phase....
or wasn't it meant that way and we just forgot the phrase?

yeah, i also believe we meant the same thing...but I used an negation of Bonus for it... and he didn't.

but then don't make it -1 if wounded, but rather NO BONUS!!!

bergil would also be a good suggestion for a half-character...!!!

still don't know why horses should be good because reduction happens in org phase... doesn't that make it worse in thruth..because it cannot discard hazards that way? And still my argument... I've never seen anybody play horses in any deck... so shouldn't that be prove enough that they are bad??? (o...

YEAH this is the best proposal since the beginning of this card...!!!
splitting it into two seems like the BEST idear ever!

At best, two cards that play nicely together, but don't depend on each other!!!

but do the wose have an extra race?
aren't they just Man chancters? or am i wrong?

so if not, it is quiet difficult to differentciate them from other characters!

any reason for limiting it to non-haven?

(I totaly agress with your new version in all other means!!!)