Any news here?

Ringbearer vs. beorning 0 - 6

It was a nice and very bloody game. CvCC from both sides. Thranduils Folk did a good job vs Ringbearers marauding orcs.

I can't play a 4th round, sorry

Bandobras Took, according to your argumentation you may even decide which faction you want to bring into play after the influence check, right? Here is an example: Éomer taps at Edoras to attempt to play a faction (Riders of Rohan or Wild Horses). He rolls 9. Thats not enough for both factions norma...

beorning vs. adanedhel 2 : 4

beorning: Elflord
card: Aamumeren Isä

The ruling seems crystal clear to me, very well articulated. What exactly should be clarified? This ruling was discussed within the netrep team of the time and that's what they ended up with. It's not the ruling itself that is unclear it's more the interpretation of the wording of the original CRF ...

So we go with answer c) it is placed out of play. No problem. I think, however, that either a further clarification will be needed in a later digest or the current ruling should be overturned.

If both players reveal this as a starting stage card, on the same site, at the same time, it is set aside, and may not be played on that site by either player until the game begins . The CRF entry on Hidden Haven is not very clear. Here's a clarification: *** If Hidden Haven is drafted as a startin...

I voted for Elf-lord, would be really nice.
I don't see the necessity to have more avatars, though. It works quite well with duplicated Wizards imho.

Aye!

thorondor wrote:i suggest, that the proxy has good quality. not only title, also picture and complete card text.

That would be my suggestion, too. In that case there is also no need to owe an original copy of the card.

Aye!

You may download my word-file of all CoE Rulings digests here.

Tookish Blood for Hobbits.