So actions caused by Greed (corruption chcecks) and Rumor of Wealth (Dragon attack) are not, from strict, technical point of view, actions caused by passive conditions.CRF, Rulings by Term, Passive Condition wrote:A passive condition causes an action to happen as stated on a card already in play.
However mechanics of that actions is similar to the mechanics of actions caused by passive conditions.*
Problem is that actions from Greed and Rumor of Wealth can be triggered at the same time as action from e.g. Troll-Purse or Known to The Ounce, or Lure of Expedience.
Definition of Passive Condition from Lidless Eye has been repleaced by that from CRF and nowadays there are no regulation in rules for such situations.
Any thought, ideas for ruling?
*) Such actions perfectly fits in the old definition:
Lidless Eye, Appendices, Glossary wrote:Condition, Passive: An action that causes another action to take effect. The triggered action will be the first declared action in the chain of effects immediately following the chain of effects that contained the passive condition.