Bandobras Took wrote: ↑Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:53 pm
What's even worse is that "skill cards" are never actually defined in the rules, unless it's the "card requiring skill" phrase in the strike sequence rules.
This kinda (or kind of) explains what
card types there are:
[Page 14 – METW, rulebook]
Clarification: Several types of cards are referred to by the key word included in the first few words of a card’s text. For example, the text of a “spell” card starts with spell; the text of a “Nazgûl” card starts with Unique. Nazgûl; the text of a “Palantír” starts with Unique. Palantír.
Extrapolation:
a
Ranger only card is a Ranger card.
a
Sage only, is a Sage card.
etc...
You could then expand this and say any cards requiring the use of the following five skills: warrior, scout, ranger, sage, and diplomat, are considered Skill cards.
Where as a Spell card is
NOT a Magic card.
So even if they
didn't include the keyword:
Magic. Shadow-magic, and just put Shadow-magic.
Magic. Spirit-magic, and just put Spirit-magic.
Magic. Sorcery, and just put Sorcery.
We may be fine, but there could have probably been a controversy of wether those are
Spells or
Spell cards.
So they put
Magic.
I think if they would have put:
Skill card. Ranger only.
Skill card. Sage only.
That would be a... IDK
But I am absolutly fine with:
Ranger only.
Sage only.
etc
2¢
As of 4/3/21 4:03:21
my current rulings foundation is based on:
All of the rules and rulings found in these PDFs at:
https://cardnum.net/rules
If you have other collected rulings that are not
listed please feel free to email them or PM me...