Lure of Power

Any rule erratum or clarification submission for the upcoming 2019 ARV should be posted here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4357
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

Lure of Power wrote:The next non-Hobbit character to make a successful influence attempt (e.g., against a faction, an opponent's character, etc.) must immediately make a corruption check modified by -4. Discard this card after the corruption check. 'But we must have power, power to order all things as we will...'-LotRII
CRF, Errata(Cards), Lure of Power wrote:Two Lure of Powers only force one check at -4, and both are discarded.
To reflect the intention expressed in CRF I propose the following erratum:

The next non-Hobbit character to make a successful influence attempt (e.g., against a faction, an opponent's character, etc.) must immediately make a corruption check modified by -4. Discard all Lure of Power cards after the corruption check. 'But we must have power, power to order all things as we will...'-LotRII
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
Top
Kjeld
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:40 pm

Shouldn't it be all Lure of Power cards on this character?
Top
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4357
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

Lure of Power is not played/placed on character.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
Top
Kjeld
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:40 pm

Ha! Good point.
Top
User avatar
CDavis7M
Posts: 2816
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:10 am
Location: California

This proposal incorrectly quotes Lure of Power. It's not a big deal in this case, but this same issue has been problematic in other cases. Let's at least copy the right card text.

The proposal also doesn't add anything to the existing clarification. There is no advantage offered by listing an errata instead of listing a clarification.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions”