Seems like sloppy wording and does not make a sense if read literally.CRF, Rulings by Term, Wizardhaven wrote:If you are influencing against your opponent, and he is at a Wizardhaven where you
can not play cards that give MPs, you can reveal the card you are influencing against
to reduce the number you roll against to 0, but you may not play that card afterwards
(if it gives MPs).
I propose the following erratum:
If character in your company is influencing against your opponent, and he is at a site where you
can not play cards that give MPs, you can reveal the card you are influencing against
to reduce the number you roll against to 0, but you may not play that card afterwards
(if it gives MPs).