Saruman's Machinery

Any rule erratum or clarification submission for the upcoming 2019 ARV should be posted here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 2745
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
Contact:

Saruman's Machinery

Post by Konrad Klar » Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:18 am

Saruman's Machinery wrote:Saruman specific. Playable, if you are Saruman, on your protected Isengard or your protected The White Towers. One technology item is playable at the site during your site phase whether the site is tapped or untapped. Discard when this site is discarded or returned to your location deck. Cannot be duplicated on a given site.
As in case of An Untimely Brood - quantity of a resource that is playable at a site does not limit a number of the resources that may be played at the site.
Fact that a resource has been played at a site, does not mean that the resource is no longer playable at the site.

I propose the following erratum:

"Saruman specific. Playable, if you are Saruman, on your protected Isengard or your protected The White Towers. One technology item may be played at the site during your site phase whether the site is tapped or untapped. Discard when this site is discarded or returned to your location deck. Cannot be duplicated on a given site."
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.

User avatar
CDavis7M
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:10 am
Location: California

Re: Saruman's Machinery

Post by CDavis7M » Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:36 pm

I agree that the language is ambiguous and I agree that it should not be considered a limitation. But I don't think that the existing language implies limitation as the more likely intention. And, I would like to consider other cards affected by this change. Right now I am not in favor.

Post Reply

Return to “2019 Annual Rules Vote - Submissions”