Page 1 of 1
Here, There, or Yonder
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:28 am
by Theo
Here, There, or Yonder wrote:Tap a character during his site phase at a tapped or untapped Ruins & Lairs [ ]. Make a roll (or draw a #) modified by +3 if character is a diplomat. An ally may be played and placed under the character’s control if the result is greater than 6 plus the allyʹs mind stat and the ally is not restricted from moving in this siteʹs region. If an ally is played, tap the site if it is not already tapped.
Focusing on the portion I underlined, allies are not restricted from moving in regions. I propose the erratum:
"and the ally would not be discarded if in a company that moves to this site."
[edit: moved -> moves]
Re: Here, There, or Yonder
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:10 am
by Konrad Klar
Maybe:
"and the ally would not be discarded if in a company that moves to this site."
?
The errata would remove a possibility to play in Under-Deeps an allies that otherwise would be discarded if in a company that moves there.
Re: Here, There, or Yonder
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:30 pm
by Theo
Accepted and updating original post.
Re: Here, There, or Yonder
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:07 am
by CDavis7M
The language discrepancy between "movement restrictions" and a particular card being "discarded" upon movement also appears in the MELE rules on playing opposite alignment items (eg Palantir)
"All restrictions to movement still apply."
Re: Here, There, or Yonder
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:00 am
by Theo
Good find. Let's try remember this for next year's proposals.