I have been thinking about "The Hunt" for a very long time now. And the more I think of it the more I get confused with it and I now consider it one of the most complex cards in this complex game.
Now here is the scenario:The Hunt wrote:Playable on Alatar during the organization phase. Name a specific hazard creature card your opponent revealed to you through a mechanism of the game and discarded. Unless eliminated or prevented from being in play, your opponent then finds this particular card (reshuffling his play deck if it was searched). This creature immediately attacks Alatar as though he were a one-character company. Alatar cannot use or benefit from spells against the attack. If untapped, tap Alatar afterwards.
Opponent did attack me with a cavedrake. I cancelled the attack. I play "the Hunt" later and kill it. Now i have another "The Hunt" in hand and play it. Can I name a cavedrake again?
This seems to tell us, that I cant.Unless eliminated or prevented from being in play, your opponent then finds this particular card
But how does "The Hunt" actually distinguish between multiple copies of a non-unique creature? I could add to the scenario I described above:
Between the cancelling of the cavedrake and my first Hunt, opponent played an unexpected Outpost and a second cavedrake. Neither me nor "The Hunt" do now know if the opponent actually has 2 cavedrakes in deck?
Now for the superfun: If I am allowed to name a cavedrake in this scenario and my opponent did use only 1 (recycled) he has to prove it and the only logical way to do this is: showing me his entire deck, discard pile and sideboard. This on the other hand would have IMMENSE tactial consequences.
I hope you can now understand why I called this thread "Hunters Dilemma". No matter how I play this card, it seems wrong to me...
Dominic