Ancient Deep-hold (Balrog Site)

The place to ask and debate all rules issues related to MECCG.
Post Reply
User avatar
Darksatin
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: Chalon sur Saône, France

It is only to verify : this site is unique or not ?


Image
Last edited by Darksatin on Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
marcos
Ex Council Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:41 pm
Location: Córdoba, Argentina

you can only add 1 copy of non-haven sites to your location deck, so i'm affraid yes, it is unique
Top
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4484
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

Is something that would prevent my opponent from playing its own copy of Ancient Deep-hold while my copy is in play?
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
Top
marcos
Ex Council Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:41 pm
Location: Córdoba, Argentina

Konrad Klar wrote:Is something that would prevent my opponent from playing its own copy of Ancient Deep-hold while my copy is in play?
no, but i guess Darksatin's question was related to having more than 1 ancient deep hold in play by the same player.

I know, technically, it is not unique because 2 players can have it in play at the same time as well as any other site. But in terms of deckbuilding, you can't add more than 1 copy of each non-haven site to location deck (deep mines is the only exception as far as i can remember)
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)”