Can be status non-deatinment changed to detainment between strike sequences (an if not: why?)?Unique. Spawn. The Wind-deeps and The Rusted-deeps each have an additional automatic-attack: Spawn-2 strikes with 16/8 prowess/body. In addition, for each Spider attack your opponent faces, you can choose for it to be at +1 prowess and detainment. ...such as Beren fought in the Mountains of Terror in Doriath ... -LotRIV
Ungoliant's Progeny
-
Konrad Klar
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
- Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
-
Bandobras Took
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 3157
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Good question. Offhand, I would say that you must choose whether the attack will be detainment or not when the attack resolves and before strikes are assigned, but I will confess that I have no hard rules to back me up.
-
Ringbearer
- Ex Council Member
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:39 pm
I would say, IMHO, that the effect alters an attack. Between strike sequences you are already resolving the attack, so it cannot be altered anymore.
Otherwise you could also cancel an attack between strikes, if the first strike goes badly wrong.
Otherwise you could also cancel an attack between strikes, if the first strike goes badly wrong.
"I used to roll the dice, feel the fear in my enemies eyes."
- Coldplay, Viva la Vida.
Gaming is life, the rest is just dice rolls.
- John Kovalic, Dork Tower
- Coldplay, Viva la Vida.
Gaming is life, the rest is just dice rolls.
- John Kovalic, Dork Tower
-
Konrad Klar
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
- Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
The same rule does not forbid altering of attack, once its strikes have been assigned.Annotation 13: An attack may not be canceled once its strikes have been assigned. A strike may not be canceled once the dice-roll for the strike has been made.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
-
Ringbearer
- Ex Council Member
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:39 pm
Okay, didnt know that one.
Still I feel like saying an attack cannot be altered in between strikes becasue of reasons given: a resolving card cant just be changed/altered in any other ways... that would create a weird and illogical situation.
Still I feel like saying an attack cannot be altered in between strikes becasue of reasons given: a resolving card cant just be changed/altered in any other ways... that would create a weird and illogical situation.
"I used to roll the dice, feel the fear in my enemies eyes."
- Coldplay, Viva la Vida.
Gaming is life, the rest is just dice rolls.
- John Kovalic, Dork Tower
- Coldplay, Viva la Vida.
Gaming is life, the rest is just dice rolls.
- John Kovalic, Dork Tower
-
Konrad Klar
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
- Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
Attack is not a card, it is effect of the card.
Attack cannot be altered before it is resolved.
Before strike assignation (when attack can be canceled) attack is already resolved. Time after strike assignation and between strike sequences is next stage of procces resolving attack.
I realize that changing status from non-deatinment changed to detainment between strike sequences is strange idea.
Question is: is it technically possible (legal)?
Attack cannot be altered before it is resolved.
Before strike assignation (when attack can be canceled) attack is already resolved. Time after strike assignation and between strike sequences is next stage of procces resolving attack.
I realize that changing status from non-deatinment changed to detainment between strike sequences is strange idea.
Question is: is it technically possible (legal)?
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.