A New Ringlord

[Konrad Klar]

Playable on your Fallen-wizard if he has The One Ring at one of your Wizardhavens [W]. Only one A New Ringlord may be played in a given turn. Make a roll during each of your end-of-turn phases if your Fallen-wizard is bearing The One Ring and is at a Ruins & Lairs [R] where information is playable. Add 1 for each A New Ringlord you have in play. If the result is less than 6, your Fallen-wizard is eliminated. If the result is greater than 9, you win the game.

'Make a roll during each of your end-of-turn phases if your Fallen-wizard is bearing The One Ring and is at a Ruins & Lairs [R] where information is playable."

Seems like action coused by passive condition. This could mean that roll is made for each copy of A New Ringlord.

Any thoughts?

[Bandobras Took]

Being one of the few people I know who actually has dunked with a FW, this explains why Blind to the West can stop ring tests -- if you roll twice for two New Ringlords, that's pretty darn good.

[melkor_morgoth75]

SO .... do u roll twice? I'm using a FW saruman A New Ringlore deck who wins (in theory) at turn 5-6 ... this could be very helpful ...

mm75

[Earendil]

'Make a roll during each of your end-of-turn phases if your Fallen-wizard is bearing The One Ring and is at a Ruins & Lairs [R] where information is playable."

Seems like action coused by passive condition. This could mean that roll is made for each copy of A New Ringlord.

Any thoughts?

I think you're right.

[melkor_morgoth75]

I think you're right.

U're spying on me Sergio ... i see you ... yeah, but u won't catch me for the Italian champ

mm75

[Shapeshifter]

The same question arouse in my recent A New Ringlord game. Are there any opposing opinions?

[Konrad Klar]

Seems like action coused by passive condition. This could mean that roll is made for each copy of A New Ringlord.

It does not sound like action caused by passive condition now for me.
Mandatory action, but there is no passive condition. Player has almost whole phase for postponing the action. The same for The Ring Will Have But One Master.

[CDavis7M]

Right, there is no passive condition.

-----

I wonder what the reasoning is for being able to roll twice. 2 = 2?

[Konrad Klar]

I wonder what the reasoning is for being able to roll twice. 2 = 2?

Strictly speaking: none.
Two cards. Each forces a making a roll.
Not ability, but obligation.
That may be welcome anyway.

[CDavis7M]

Two cards. Each forces a making a roll.

Yes, the player is required to make a roll. I see the requirement.

Two copies of the same card have the same requirement.

But why would they roll twice?

[Konrad Klar]

Once for each card (that enforces the roll).

[CDavis7M]

I guess that's what I suspected was the rationale: 2 cards = 2 rolls.

It's not persuasive.

[Uwe]

Hi,same for Challenge the Power.Make a roll for each sage in the company and for each other ChtP in play.If you have 3 of them I roll 3x.Outcome of the roll the card can be discarded,go to the MP pile of effects the Hog.Uwe

[Konrad Klar]

Balrog specific. Playable on The Balrog if he bears The One Ring. Make a roll adding one for each sage in his company and for each other Challenge the Power in play. If the result is: less than 7, The Balrog is eliminated; 7 or 8, discard this card; 9 or 10, you gain 2 marshalling points and The One Ring affects The Balrog; greater than 10, you win the game. Cannot be duplicated on a given turn.

Not the same. The roll from Challenge the Power is an action performed when the card is resolved; one time action. It is not an action activated later. You may have three Challenge the Power on Balrog and not win the game.

[Uwe]

Hi,oh so i roll once and add the number of sages and ChtP i have in play?