the Jabberwock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 5:51 am
As to Theo's point about competing immediate actions, I think Dark Numbers should still be allowed. I would argue that any number of immediate actions are legal, so long as all of them take place prior to any non-immediate actions being performed.
Opponent may declare non-immediate action in response to declaration of an immediate action, just to prevent declaration of other immediate actions.
E.g. he may play Doors of Night in response to declaration of cc made by Alatar to prevent a playing Dark Numbers.
Player taking his turn has right to make declaration before his opponent, so he may play Dark Numbers in response to declaration of cc made by Alatar, but still Doors of Night declared as next action in response would prevent declaration of second copy of Dark Numbers.
New Friendship played in response to declaration of cc made by Alatar would prevent declaration of any "immediate action" hazard (and resource too).
I propose following solution:
Immediate action, i.e. an action that must be declared by a player immediately after completion of some other action, may be declared as long as the player does not declare a non-immediate action starting a chain of effects. The player that had possibility to start a new chain of effects , but decided to pass or declare non-immediate action, loses a possibility of declaring an immediate action.