Page 1 of 1
Tom Bombadil vs. agents
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:02 pm
by Khamul the Easterling
Can Tom cancel an attack from an agent (at a site in his regions)? I daresay no, as agents aren't hazards, is this correct? Thanks!
Re: Tom Bombadil vs. agents
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:41 pm
by Konrad Klar
Agents played as hazards are hazards.
But agents (themselves) do not target anything.
So (short answer:) no.
Re: Tom Bombadil vs. agents
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:12 pm
by Khamul the Easterling
Thanks, yes, I meant agents played as hazards. However, isn't an agent attacking a company targetting that company?
Re: Tom Bombadil vs. agents
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:30 pm
by Konrad Klar
Agent's attack targets a company. But agent itself does not.
Similarly the action from Snowstorm - return a company to a site of origin - targets the company, but Snowstorm itself does not.
Tom Bombadil can tap to cancel the effects of one hazard that targets a company (of entity associated with the company).
Tom Bombadil cannot tap to cancel effects that target a company (of entity associated with the company) if they are not effects of hazard that targets the company (of entity associated with the company).