My company is in Rivendell.
I play "Great Road" and "Cram" to go to Dunharrow.
Then, I play "Master of Esgaroth" to go to the Pukel-deeps.
At the end of the turn, I am back in Rivendell ?
Are these moves legal ?
Great-Road + Master of Esgaroth
As per text of Great-Road, I don't see why not... The replacement of the site card is at the end of turn, so it does not interfere with the m/h phase (or phases, in this case).
Unless any CRF says other thing, I would say yes.
Unless any CRF says other thing, I would say yes.
C'mon, not the Elves of Lindon AGAIN...
- Konrad Klar
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
- Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
Master of Esgaroth may be played at the end of organization phase, not at the end of M/H phase.Darksatin wrote:Then, I play "Master of Esgaroth" to go to the Pukel-deeps.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
Totally correct. However, if he plays "Master of Esgaroth" in Org phase and then makes the movement, I think he could then replace the Pukel-Deeps with Rivendell at the end of turn.Konrad Klar wrote:Master of Esgaroth may be played at the end of organization phase, not at the end of M/H phase.Darksatin wrote:Then, I play "Master of Esgaroth" to go to the Pukel-deeps.
C'mon, not the Elves of Lindon AGAIN...
- Konrad Klar
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
- Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
I think so too.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
- Konrad Klar
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
- Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
Multiple corruption checks from multiple copies of Lure of Senses also may (try to) be declared at end of the same untap phase.dirhaval wrote:I think that such a combo is invalid.
Both cards mention playing at the end of the organization phase, so you cannot play two cards to end the phase.
I think MECCG did something right with such wording to not have too much abuse.
Should all of them but one fizzle, because only the one is declared at end of untap phase (and because after end of an untap phase there is no longer the untap phase)?
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
- Bandobras Took
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm
dirhaval wrote:I think that such a combo is invalid.
Both cards mention playing at the end of the organization phase, so you cannot play two cards to end the phase.
edit: Forgot a bracket.CRF, End Of wrote:End (at the end of...)
@ When an action specifies it must be taken at the end of a phase no actions may be taken after it in that phase that do not also specify that they must be taken at the end of said phase. [CoE] %
Last edited by Bandobras Took on Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
The game is flawed, but this does not mean it cannot be loved.
- Konrad Klar
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
- Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
[quote="CRF, End Of"End (at the end of...)"]
@ When an action specifies it must be taken at the end of a phase no actions may be taken after it in that phase that do not also specify that they must be taken at the end of said phase. [CoE] %[/quote]
No chance to play Old Friendship in response to cc?
@ When an action specifies it must be taken at the end of a phase no actions may be taken after it in that phase that do not also specify that they must be taken at the end of said phase. [CoE] %[/quote]
No chance to play Old Friendship in response to cc?
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
- Bandobras Took
- Rules Wizard
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm
So it would seem.
The game is flawed, but this does not mean it cannot be loved.