Helms of Iron wrote:Playable only if you have a Nazgûl permanent-event in play. Discard the Nazgûl when this card is brought into play. All Orc, Troll, and Man attacks with body have their body modified by +1; and all Orc, Troll, and Man attacks with no body have 4 body. ...on the front of their iron helms was an S-rune, wrought of some white metal.-LotRIII
Scimitars of Steel wrote:Playable only if you have a Nazgûl permanent-event in play. Discard the Nazgûl when this card is brought into play. All Orc, Troll, and Man attacks receive +1 prowess. Day drew on. The goblins gathered again in the valley. There a host of Wargs came ravening and with them came the bodyguard of Bolg, goblins of huge size with scimitars of steel.-Hob
An article a in the phrase "Playable only if you have a Nazgûl permanent-event in play." indicates an unspecified Nazgûl permanent-event.
In other words a different Nazgûl permanent-events may satisfy a playability conditions, one at declaration, other at resolution.
However an article the in the phrase "Discard the Nazgûl when this card is brought into play." indicates that the Nazgûl permanent-event is specified i.e. previously chosen, or mentioned Nazgûl permanent-event.
Therefore it is unclear (for me) whether a/the discarded Nazgûl permanent-event is a target of the "discard" action, or not.
I am suspecting that intention of ICE has been expressed in the phrase "Playable only if you have a Nazgûl permanent-event in play." and use of the in the phrase "Discard the Nazgûl when this card is brought into play." is unfortunate (i.e. the article should be replaced by a, and if so it should be addressed by next errata).
Comments?