which is a little off, but with this fix we can continue ...Clarification 7 wrote:A detainment attack is considered successful if its prowess is higher than the defending character's final prowess whether he tapped or not
What does "whether he tapped or not." mean here?minor, underline mine wrote:A strike from a detainment attack is considered successful if its prowess is higher than the defending character's final prowess whether he tapped or not.
To me this means...
If I have a character with 6 prowess facing a 9 prowess strike, from a detainment attack. If I choose to let him tap, and I roll a 3, then the final prowesses are 9 v 9, or 9 not greater than 9. My guy is tapped, but that doesn't matter, the final prowess is 9 v 9.
Correct?
changed, "choose to tap him" to "choose to let him tap"