Page 1 of 1
A New Ringlord
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:55 am
by Konrad Klar
Playable on your Fallen-wizard if he has The One Ring at one of your Wizardhavens [W]. Only one A New Ringlord may be played in a given turn. Make a roll during each of your end-of-turn phases if your Fallen-wizard is bearing The One Ring and is at a Ruins & Lairs [R] where information is playable. Add 1 for each A New Ringlord you have in play. If the result is less than 6, your Fallen-wizard is eliminated. If the result is greater than 9, you win the game.
'Make a roll during each of your end-of-turn phases if your Fallen-wizard is bearing The One Ring and is at a Ruins & Lairs [R] where information is playable."
Seems like action coused by passive condition. This could mean that roll is made for each copy of A New Ringlord.
Any thoughts?
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:08 pm
by Bandobras Took
Being one of the few people I know who actually has dunked with a FW, this explains why Blind to the West can stop ring tests -- if you roll twice for two New Ringlords, that's pretty darn good.
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:09 am
by melkor_morgoth75
SO .... do u roll twice? I'm using a FW saruman A New Ringlore deck who wins (in theory) at turn 5-6 ... this could be very helpful ...
mm75
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:23 am
by Earendil
Konrad Klar wrote:
'Make a roll during each of your end-of-turn phases if your Fallen-wizard is bearing The One Ring and is at a Ruins & Lairs [R] where information is playable."
Seems like action coused by passive condition. This could mean that roll is made for each copy of A New Ringlord.
Any thoughts?
I think you're right.
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:58 am
by melkor_morgoth75
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:13 am
by Shapeshifter
The same question arouse in my recent A New Ringlord game. Are there any opposing opinions?
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 1:52 pm
by Konrad Klar
Konrad Klar wrote: ↑Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:55 am
Seems like action coused by passive condition. This could mean that roll is made for each copy of A New Ringlord.
It does not sound like action caused by passive condition now for me.
Mandatory action, but there is no passive condition. Player has almost whole phase for postponing the action. The same for The Ring Will Have But One Master.
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 6:13 am
by CDavis7M
Right, there is no passive condition.
-----
I wonder what the reasoning is for being able to roll twice. 2 = 2?
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 6:36 am
by Konrad Klar
CDavis7M wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 6:13 am
I wonder what the reasoning is for being able to roll twice. 2 = 2?
Strictly speaking: none.
Two cards. Each forces a making a roll.
Not ability, but obligation.
That may be welcome anyway.
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 5:00 pm
by CDavis7M
Konrad Klar wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 6:36 am
Two cards. Each forces a making a roll.
Yes, the player is required to make a roll. I see the requirement.
Two copies of the same card have the same requirement.
But why would they roll twice?
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2023 6:15 pm
by Konrad Klar
Once for each card (that enforces the roll).
Re: A New Ringlord
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2023 11:30 pm
by CDavis7M
I guess that's what I suspected was the rationale: 2 cards = 2 rolls.
It's not persuasive.
