reluctant final parting vs fw

The place to ask and debate all rules issues related to MECCG.
Post Reply
coro
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: barcelona - the shire

Hi,

How does it works reluctant final parting against FW?

I mean if my opponent has Tom Bomb in a minion site doest it gets discarded?

And vs non unic allies, for example the wark king in a hero site?

thanks
marcos
Ex Council Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:41 pm
Location: Córdoba, Argentina

the warg king IS unique... but anyway, we get your point ;)

hope to see you soon online at GCCG :D

BTW: I don't know the answer to your question, i was asking myself the same :lol:
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4484
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

CRF, Rulins by Term, Reluctant Final Parting wrote:Card Errratum: Add "Determine nearest Haven using site cards of the same alignment (minion/hero) as the ally." [Effective 4/20/98] Reluctant Final Parting has no effect on The Balrog.
So Goldberry (hero ally) is at minion Zarak-Dum, nearest haven of hero Zarak-Dum is checked. It is Rivendell, so the same as for Old Forest - site at which Goldberry is playable. Goldberry is not discarded.
The Warg-King is playable at [-me_rl-] with AA of Volves, normally that are: Isengard (nh:Geann a-Lish), Weathertop (nh:Carn Dum), Ost-In-Edhil (nh:Carn Dum), and The White Towers (nh:Carn Dum).
The Warg-King will be discarded if at site that minion version has nearest haven other than Geann a-Lish or Carn Dum, or if at under-deeps.
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
marcos
Ex Council Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:41 pm
Location: Córdoba, Argentina

clear! thanks!
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions & Debate (unofficial)”