Prowess of Age on guard
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:17 pm
Another one came up last night:
So the question came up whether this is legal. An on-guard card must be played as if it was played in movement hazard phase concerning playability conditions, right? What do you say?
An awesome haz-play by Vastor last night: Turn 1 (!), I move my Trolls to the Caves of Ulond to try Black Maze + Thrors Map. Vastor plays the very ugly Agburanar at home and one on guard. No problem I thought. Face 1st AA and crept along the 2nd cleverly. But wtf!?! Vastor reveals Prowess of Age on guard to cancel my cancel!Prowess of Age
Targets and cancels any effect which (declared earlier in the same chain of effects) that would cancel an attack from a unique Dragon manifestation. Alternatively, gives a prowess bonus to a Dragon or Drake attack (must be played before its strikes are assigned) dictated by the number of Prowess of Age cards played on the attack: +1 prowess if 1 played; +4 if 2 played; +9 if 3 played.

So the question came up whether this is legal. An on-guard card must be played as if it was played in movement hazard phase concerning playability conditions, right? What do you say?