General UEP feedback:

Anything MECCG related that doesn't fit in another forum.
The Global Players List is located here.
Post Reply

UEP feedback:

I like UEPs
8
47%
I'm impartial to UEPs
3
18%
I dislike UEPs
6
35%
 
Total votes: 17
Jambo
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 3:01 pm

Created a new thread for general UEP feedback.

The results from the previous UEP poll up to 03 Feb 2007 were:

I like UEPs. 38% [ 8 ]
I like UEPs, but am wary of the direction they're going. 9% [ 2 ]
I'm cautious about UEPs (undecided). 14% [ 3 ]
What are UEPs? 0% [ 0 ]
I dislike UEPs, but would happily use them if opponent wanted. 9% [ 2 ]
I dislike UEPs, period. 28% [ 6 ]

Total Votes : 21

I've created a new poll with a reduced number of categories for simplicity. Please complete the poll and include any other comments, suggestions or criticisms below.

Thanks
jaded
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:47 am
Location: Poland

I'm not up to date, but I think UEP shouldn't change things that do not have to be changed (like plyablity of barrow wight)
Jambo
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 3:01 pm

Hi jaded,

UEPs were designed and put forward for a variety of reasons; one of them being for thematic play. These were voted upon by the community in the same way other UEPs were and interestingly this one, which you raised the question over, actually acquired a unanimous voting in favour of the proposal (i.e. 100%)!

:)
User avatar
Bandobras Took
Rules Wizard
Posts: 3109
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm

Though had I been around then, I probably would have voted no. There are already ways to make a Barrow-Wight playable at the Barrow Downs (changing the site type, Sleepless Malice, etc.). On the other hand, most of the UEPs I'm fully in favor of; those of which I disapprove were ones wherein I was outvoted by the community, so I accept them, anyway.
Post Reply

Return to “Odds, Ends & Hobbit Holes”