Draft of CoE Digest #204 Q5 - Cards that increase or reduce the hazard limit leaving play - Open until March 18th

Locked
User avatar
Manuel
Council Chairman
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:31 am

In order to contribute to this thread please follow these rules:

1) The thread will be open until March 18th.
2) There will be a maximum of one reply per forum user, and that reply cannot be edited. We want to actively avoid starting "flame wars", so please speak your peace, let others speak their peace, and that's it.
3) After the review period, the RC will carefully consider everyone's contributions, revise the draft as appropriate, and then the Digest will be published and official.
What happens when a card that is modifying the hazard limit no longer has its conditions met or otherwise leaves play?

Many cards that affect a company’s hazard limit are short-events, which upon resolution apply an effect that lasts for as long as specified on the card (or until end of turn, per CoE Digest 31). However, there are a handful of cards, mostly permanent-events, that have a modifying effect upon a company’s hazard limit while they are in play; many of these effects are based on passive conditions, and so the question is what happens to the hazard limit when those conditions are no longer met, or beyond that, what happens when such a card is discarded, returned to its player’s hand, or otherwise removed from active play.

To the first half of the question, when a passive condition is no longer in effect, its resulting effect also goes away immediately (see ICE 33, ICE 515, COE 201, etc.), meaning that if a company’s hazard limit is being affected based on some condition and that condition is no longer active, that particular effect on the hazard limit is removed and the hazard limit reverts to what it would have been without that effect being applied. This type of card would include:

Drums (if the company is no longer at or moving to an Under-deeps site)
Earcaraxe at Home (if the company no longer has a Coastal Sea in site path)
Eyes of the Shadow (if any of the criteria are no longer met)
Gandalf the White Rider (if the company is no longer overt)
Radagast the Tamer (if the company is no longer moving through the correct regions)

To the second half of the question, per the CRF under “Discard” (see CRF 9):
If a card leaves active play, including being returned to a player’s hand, it immediately ceases having an effect on play.
In other words, any effects of a card in play that are modifying a company’s hazard limit would immediately end if the card itself leaves play, reverting the hazard limit to what it normally would have been without the effect (also confirmed in ICE 114, etc.). This type of card would include:

Bairanax at Home
Crept Along Carefully
Drums
Earcaraxe at Home
Eyes of the Shadow
Gandalf the White Rider
Going Ever Under Dark
The Great Eye
Power Built by Waiting
Radagast the Tamer
Shadow of Mordor


Finally, it is worth noting that some cards may require that they be discarded from active play in order to modify a company’s hazard limit, such as Daelomin at Home. In these cases, the card’s effect has an active condition of discarding the card, meaning that the effect itself is only initiated if the card is discarded, thus superseding the CRF’s requirement that the card still be in play.

Note that this digest overrules ICE Digest 71 and COE Digest 11.
www.meccg.com
User avatar
Konrad Klar
Rules Wizard
Posts: 4357
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland

Essentially the same story (and the same disagreement) as for ". Additionally, any sage at a site in a Dark-domain or Gorgoroth, or moving with a [-me_dd-] or Gorgoroth in his site path, loses his sage skill." in text of In the Heart of his Realm.

Some state may be a result of action caused by passive condition. Some state may be ongoing effect of card in play.
But not both at the same time.

Dependence on a presence of some card in play and/or on condition that caused some action is not peculiarity of a result of action caused by passive condition.
Company returned by action from Snowstorm remains returned even if after resolution of the action Snowstorm is discarded (condition of having at least one [-me_wi-] in company site path disappears too, because company that does not move does not have site path anymore).

In my opinion an increasing of HL caused by:

Drums (if the company is no longer at or moving to an Under-deeps site)
Earcaraxe at Home (if the company no longer has a Coastal Sea in site path)
Eyes of the Shadow (if any of the criteria are no longer met)
Gandalf the White Rider (if the company is no longer overt)
Radagast the Tamer (if the company is no longer moving through the correct regions)

is result of action caused by passive condition.

And e.g. for Gandalf the White Rider the action may be triggered multiple times even in the same M/H phase (if overt company's M/H phase is started, then company becomes non-overt, then it again becomes overt).
We will not speak of such things even in the morning of the Shire.
User avatar
Manuel
Council Chairman
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:31 am

Thanks everyone for your contributions. The RC will study them carefully and come up with a final digest soon.
www.meccg.com
Locked

Return to “Drafts”