Page 1 of 1
Old Road
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 11:38 am
by Konrad Klar
Code: Select all
<p>Tap a character at a untapped Haven [{H}] during the site phase. The character makes an attempt to bring a faction into play (reveal the faction with the card). The length of the site path from this Haven to the site at which the faction can be played must be two or less (this must be verified by an available site card). The influence check for this attempt is modified by -1 and is <i>not</i> modified by the influencing character's direct influence. If the attempt is successful tap the character’s site. May be used to influence an opponent’s faction only when you are attempting to bring your copy of the faction into play.</p><p>Cannot be included in a Fallen-wizard's deck.</p>
1.
Text does not reflect CoE errata.
2.
Whether a card "Cannot be included in a Fallen-wizard's deck." is decided by other set of rules, not by text of a card itself.
Re: Old Road
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 8:38 pm
by Kodi
Konrad Klar wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2024 11:38 am
1. Text does not reflect CoE errata.
You are right. Anyway, the Old Road text in the current database is correct. The CoE version simply does not include the CRF clarifications and the initial "untapped". We will review it in the next CRF.
Konrad Klar wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2024 11:38 am
2. Whether a card "Cannot be included in a Fallen-wizard's deck." is decided by other set of rules, not by text of a card itself.
We have used the precedent of cards like
Foul Fumes from the Challenge Deck version. In this version, they add a rule that appears in the MELE booklet. We believe this information is valuable for players to have directly on the card text.
- Foul-Fumes-Challenge-Deck.jpg (115.44 KiB) Viewed 749 times
Thank you very much, we look forward to more reports!
Re: Old Road and other discrepancies
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2025 8:28 am
by Konrad Klar
Instead of creating a new topic I decided to report another discrepancy here.
FEAR! FIRE! FOES!
Card Erratum: Change «…playable on a detainment automatic-attack a minion company is facing. The attack becomes normal…» to «…playable on a detainment automatic-attack. Against a minion company the attack becomes normal…». [CoE IE 2018]
Playable on a Free-hold [
![[-me_fh-]](./images/smilies/me_fh.png "Free Hold")
]
or Border-hold [
![[-me_bh-]](./images/smilies/me_bh.png "Border Hold")
]. An additional automatic-attack is created at the site this turn: 5 strikes with 8 prowess (detainment, no attack type). Alternatively,
playable on a detainment automatic-attack a minion company is facing. The attack becomes normal (not detainment) and has -1 prowess.
There is still "a minion company is facing" that is so complicating a life (and lack of "Against a minion company").