Page 1 of 1

Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
by Shapeshifter
CRF, Rulings by Term, Fallen-wizard wrote:If any version of a site is in play or in your discard pile, you may not play another version of that site.
Strictly reading of this CRF would mean that you - as a Fallen Wizard - may not move to your opponent's current site with any of your companies. Thus making any CvCC, riddling games or influencing attempts on characters, allies and items impossible. This cannot be intended.

My suggestion is to add the words "by you" to the current CRF entry.
suggested change wrote:If any version of a site is in play by you or in your discard pile, you may not play another version of that site.

Re: Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:26 am
by Konrad Klar
I agree with the proposal.
Shapeshifter wrote:Strictly reading of this CRF would mean that you - as a Fallen Wizard - may not move to your opponent's current site with any of your companies.
According to current text of CRF rule a FW companies can move to opponent's site as long they are using the same version of the site as version already in play.

Re: Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2017 6:31 pm
by Shapeshifter
This is probably better english:
suggested change wrote:If you have any version of a site in play or in your discard pile, you may not play another version of that site.

Re: Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 3:33 am
by CCG Collector
I know I'm fairly late to this discussion, but with a rule like that, what's the purpose of the lost challenge deck P - Fallen Alatar - having two different versions of both Isengard and The White Towers? I'm not very familiar with Fallen-Wizard rules, so maybe it's something simple I've overlooked, but is it just to have to option to pick between one or the other depending on the situation in the game?

Re: Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 5:21 am
by Bandobras Took
So long as a site is not in the discard pile, being able to choose which version you go to can be profitable, depending on the deck (I had one which used Carambor to keep on visiting different versions of the Lossadan Cairn to play/store Palantiri and also play the Wolves).

Re: Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:14 pm
by the JabberwocK
Shapeshifter wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:49 am
CRF, Rulings by Term, Fallen-wizard wrote:If any version of a site is in play or in your discard pile, you may not play another version of that site.
Strictly reading of this CRF would mean that you - as a Fallen Wizard - may not move to your opponent's current site with any of your companies. Thus making any CvCC, riddling games or influencing attempts on characters, allies and items impossible. This cannot be intended.

My suggestion is to add the words "by you" to the current CRF entry.
suggested change wrote:If any version of a site is in play by you or in your discard pile, you may not play another version of that site.
Is there any reason this was not submitted for the 2018 ARV?

Re: Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:04 am
by Shapeshifter
the Jabberwock wrote: Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:14 pm Is there any reason this was not submitted for the 2018 ARV?
No, I simply forgot about that.

Re: Limited site use for FW companies?

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:46 pm
by the JabberwocK
Shapeshifter wrote: Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:04 am
the Jabberwock wrote: Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:14 pm Is there any reason this was not submitted for the 2018 ARV?
No, I simply forgot about that.
Ok cool, thanks. I was just curious if something had changed which discouraged the submission.