Literally this means that except any Nazgûl attack, it is irrelevant who faces other types of detainment attacks. Text of "attack" card may specify its own conditions. But for 3rd and 4th types of detainment attacks it seems odd that a non-minion company should face them as a detainment.Lidless Eye, Starter Rules, Combat , Detainment Attacks wrote:Certain attacks detain targets rather than wound them. When a strike from a detainment attack is successful, an untapped target is tapped instead of being wounded. This represents the target being stopped and questioned. The following types of attacks are detainment attacks:
Card text will sometimes state that an attack is a detainment attack.
Any Nazgûl attack against a minion company is a detainment attack.
Any attack keyed to Dark-domain, Shadow-hold, or Dark-hold is a detainment attack.
Any Orc, Troll, Undead, or Man attack keyed to Shadow-land is a detainment attack.
The parameters above apply if the attack is keyed to the region symbol or site symbol (by type) or if keyed to a region or site by name which happens to be of the appropriate type (i.e. has the appropriate symbol).
I propose the following erratum:
"Certain attacks detain targets rather than wound them. When a strike from a detainment attack is successful, an untapped target is tapped instead of being wounded. This represents the target being stopped and questioned. The following types of attacks are detainment attacks:
Card text will sometimes state that an attack is a detainment attack.
Any Nazgûl attack against a minion company is a detainment attack.
Any attack keyed to Dark-domain, Shadow-hold, or Dark-hold against a minion company is a detainment attack.
Any Orc, Troll, Undead, or Man attack keyed to Shadow-land against a minion company is a detainment attack.
The parameters above apply if the attack is keyed to the region symbol or site symbol (by type) or if keyed to a region or site by name which happens to be of the appropriate type (i.e. has the appropriate symbol)."